From 9c3c02c393ba3d7440e3e130c4c9a85430386360 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:32:55 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Add bug link.

---
 blog/data/2010-08-26-fs-sematics.txt | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/blog/data/2010-08-26-fs-sematics.txt b/blog/data/2010-08-26-fs-sematics.txt
index d522c01509..98d1c8f8d9 100644
--- a/blog/data/2010-08-26-fs-sematics.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2010-08-26-fs-sematics.txt
@@ -94,3 +94,6 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 <p>So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
-- 
2.47.2