From 834625244e97305bc552eaeb5fed85aac172a8fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:54:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Typo. --- blog/data/2017-11-01-storage-fault-tolerance.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blog/data/2017-11-01-storage-fault-tolerance.txt b/blog/data/2017-11-01-storage-fault-tolerance.txt index df451fc356..afb756d79f 100644 --- a/blog/data/2017-11-01-storage-fault-tolerance.txt +++ b/blog/data/2017-11-01-storage-fault-tolerance.txt @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ are few options on Linux addressing all the identified issues. Both ZFS and Btrfs are doing a fairly good job, but have legal and practical issues on their own. I wonder how cluster file systems like Ceph do in this regard. After all, there is an old saying, you know -you have a distributed system when the crash of a compyter you have +you have a distributed system when the crash of a computer you have never heard of stops you from getting any work done. The same holds true if fault tolerance do not work.

-- 2.47.2