From 33aedcff0ec3782f5f731572841b98578918ef05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:25:41 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add an update.

---
 blog/data/2012-04-19-rand.txt | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/blog/data/2012-04-19-rand.txt b/blog/data/2012-04-19-rand.txt
index 5726378cac..c6a4140835 100644
--- a/blog/data/2012-04-19-rand.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2012-04-19-rand.txt
@@ -45,3 +45,13 @@ attention to these issues in the future.</p>
 from Simon Phipps
 (<a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2010/11/rand-not-so-reasonable/">RAND:
 Not So Reasonable?</a>).</p>
+
+<p>Update 2012-04-21: Just came across a
+<a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2012/04/of-microsoft-netscape-patents-and-open-standards/index.htm">blog
+post from Glyn Moody</a> over at Computer World UK warning about the
+same issue, and urging people to speak out to the UK government.  I
+can only urge Norwegian users to do the same for
+<a href="http://www.standard.difi.no/hoyring/hoyring-om-nye-anbefalte-it-standarder">the
+hearing taking place at the moment</a> (respond before 2012-04-27).
+It proposes to require video conferencing standards including
+specifications with RAND terms.</p>
-- 
2.47.2