From 155ed3e2a8fe981b6b447721a485a67be8771f2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:10:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Prepare for publication. --- blog/data/2012-10-26-system-downtime.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/blog/data/2012-10-26-system-downtime.txt b/blog/data/2012-10-26-system-downtime.txt index aa75978d16..bce5c87b0e 100644 --- a/blog/data/2012-10-26-system-downtime.txt +++ b/blog/data/2012-10-26-system-downtime.txt @@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ Technician: [xxx] been a bit too free form to make it easy to automatically process them into a database for further analysis, and I would have used ISO 8601 dates myself to make it easier to process (in other words I would ask -people to write '2012-06-16 06:00' instead of the start time format -listed above). There are also other issues with the format that could -be improved, read the article for the details.

+people to write '2012-06-16 06:00 +0000' instead of the start time +format listed above). There are also other issues with the format +that could be improved, read the article for the details.

I find the idea of standardising outage messages seem to be such a good idea that I would like to get it implemented here at the -- 2.47.2