From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:01:49 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Fix links and typos. X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/commitdiff_plain/fb0874a084d4965fe01155b53b31aad64487b0e8?ds=sidebyside Fix links and typos. --- diff --git a/blog/data/2013-03-26-green-font.txt b/blog/data/2013-03-26-green-font.txt index 6041ed3f52..a1f9985a32 100644 --- a/blog/data/2013-03-26-green-font.txt +++ b/blog/data/2013-03-26-green-font.txt @@ -7,26 +7,27 @@ time, without much sacrifice? A small step could be to change the font you use when printing.

Three years ago, -Arts +Arts Techinca reported how the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay changed their default front from -Arial to -Century +Arial to +Century Gothic to save money. The Century Gothic font uses 30% less toner than Arial to print the same text. In other word, you could cut your toner costs by 30% (or actually, increase your toner supply life time by 30%, by simply changing the default font used in your prints.

But it is not quite obvious how much one will safe by switching. -The University of Wisconsis-Green Bay said it used $100,000 per year -on unk and toner cartridges, according to -a report from +The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay said it used $100,000 per year +on ink and toner cartridges, according to +a report from TwinCities.com, and expected to save between $5,000 and $10,000 per year by asking staff and students to use a different font. Not -all PDFs are created interally, and those from external sources will +all PDFs are created internally, and those from external sources will still use their "native" font. Also, the Century Gothic font is slightly wider than Arial, and thus might use more sheets of paper to -print the same text, so the savings depend on the usage.

+print the same text, so the total saving depend on the documents +printed.

But it is definitely something to consider, if you want to reduce the amount of trash, decrease the amount of toner used in the world