From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:58:28 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Update.
X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/commitdiff_plain/a3291bd88debba4afe0c6352848029e6eaa5a827

Update.
---

diff --git a/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt b/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
index a3b176f38a..38964771ff 100644
--- a/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
@@ -38,3 +38,17 @@ books), <a href="http://runeberg.org/">Project Runenberg</a> (1,652
 books) and <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/texts">The Internet
 Archive</a> (3,641,797 books) have heaps of books without DRM, which
 can read by anyone and shared with anyone.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2012-10-23: On the evening the day the story broke, Amazon
+restored the account of the user, as reported by
+<a href="http://www.digi.no/904675/helomvending-fra-amazon">digi.no</a>
+and <a href="http://nrk.no/kultur-og-underholdning/1.8368487">NRK</a>.
+Apparently public pressure work.  The story from Martin have seen
+several twitter messages per minute the last 24 hours, and is still
+drawing quote a lot of attention.  But even if the account is
+restored, the fundamental problem still exist.  I recommend reading
+two opinions from
+<a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2012/10/rights-you-have-no-right-to-your-ebooks/index.htm">Simon
+Phipps</a> and
+<a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2012/10/is-amazon-playing-fair/index.htm">Glen
+Moody</a> if you want to learn more about the fundamentals.</p>