X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/06062568aeddc1e6980528b699722e39a5eb8194..3aaa32eb193b6b49e948aa852fef60aa9c029c1c:/blog/No_patch_is_not_better_than_a_useless_patch.html diff --git a/blog/No_patch_is_not_better_than_a_useless_patch.html b/blog/No_patch_is_not_better_than_a_useless_patch.html index 2cce5885ba..ccbd4c0780 100644 --- a/blog/No_patch_is_not_better_than_a_useless_patch.html +++ b/blog/No_patch_is_not_better_than_a_useless_patch.html @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ - - - Petter Reinholdtsen: No patch is not better than a useless patch - - - - -
-

- Petter Reinholdtsen - -

- -
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + + + + Petter Reinholdtsen: No patch is not better than a useless patch + + + + +
+

+ Petter Reinholdtsen + +

+ +
-
-
No patch is not better than a useless patch
-
2009-04-28 09:30
-
-

Julien Blache +

+
No patch is not better than a useless patch
+
28th April 2009
+

Julien Blache claim that no patch is better than a useless patch. I completely disagree, as a patch allow one to discuss a concrete and proposed solution, and also @@ -28,21 +28,74 @@ prove that the issue at hand is important enough for someone to spent time on fixing it. No patch do not provide any of these positive properties.

- -
Tags: debian, english, nuug.
- -
+ +
Tags: debian, english, nuug.
+ + +
+ + + + + - + +
+

+ Created by Chronicle v4.4 +

+ +