X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/056ef442e0ffec05f39dc8cbfa78519da1ace0f5..4c73837e3a3a1eb5718633a359d4e9d17ec26e16:/blog/Relative_popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html diff --git a/blog/Relative_popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html b/blog/Relative_popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html index 03cadff557..da7606f5fd 100644 --- a/blog/Relative_popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html +++ b/blog/Relative_popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ - - - Petter Reinholdtsen: Relative popularity of document formats (MS Office vs. ODF) - - - - -
-

- Petter Reinholdtsen - -

- -
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + + + + Petter Reinholdtsen: Relative popularity of document formats (MS Office vs. ODF) + + + + +
+

+ Petter Reinholdtsen + +

+ +
-
-
Relative popularity of document formats (MS Office vs. ODF)
-
2009-08-12 15:50
-
-

Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF +

+
Relative popularity of document formats (MS Office vs. ODF)
+
12th August 2009
+

Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:

@@ -70,20 +70,44 @@ search done from a machine here in Norway.

Interesting difference, not sure what to conclude from these numbers.

- -
Tags: english, nuug, standard, web.
- -
+ +
Tags: english, nuug, standard, web.
+ + +
+ + + + + +

+ Created by Chronicle v4.4 +

+ +