Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / index.rss

diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss
index 2225417371e53f47d735c17c763c2492812a5b84..ebbb9bec916f61960325d2521ee3f377f1b11ae7 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/index.rss
+++ b/blog/index.rss
@@ -6,6 +6,47 @@
                 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/</link>
                 <atom:link href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        
+       <item>
+               <title>systemd, an interesting alternative to upstart</title>
+               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/systemd__an_interesting_alternative_to_upstart.html</link>
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/systemd__an_interesting_alternative_to_upstart.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 22:20:00 +0200</pubDate>
+               <description>
+&lt;p&gt;The last few days a new boot system called
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd&quot;&gt;systemd&lt;/a&gt;
+has been
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html&quot;&gt;introduced&lt;/a&gt;
+
+to the free software world.  I have not yet had time to play around
+with it, but it seem to be a very interesting alternative to
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://upstart.ubuntu.com/&quot;&gt;upstart&lt;/a&gt;, and might prove to be
+a good alternative for Debian when we are able to switch to an event
+based boot system.  Tollef is
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.debian.org/580814&quot;&gt;in the process&lt;/a&gt; of getting
+systemd into Debian, and I look forward to seeing how well it work.  I
+like the fact that systemd handles init.d scripts with dependency
+information natively, allowing them to run in parallel where upstart
+at the moment do not.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately do systemd have the same problem as upstart regarding
+platform support.  It only work on recent Linux kernels, and also need
+some new kernel features enabled to function properly.  This means
+kFreeBSD and Hurd ports of Debian will need a port or a different boot
+system.  Not sure how that will be handled if systemd proves to be the
+way forward.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In the mean time, based on the
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/05/msg00122.html&quot;&gt;input
+on debian-devel@&lt;/a&gt; regarding parallel booting in Debian, I have
+decided to enable full parallel booting as the default in Debian as
+soon as possible (probably this weekend or early next week), to see if
+there are any remaining serious bugs in the init.d dependencies.  A
+new version of the sysvinit package implementing this change is
+already in experimental.  If all go well, Squeeze will be released
+with parallel booting enabled by default.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
        <item>
                <title>Parallellizing the boot in Debian Squeeze - ready for wider testing</title>
                <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Parallellizing_the_boot_in_Debian_Squeeze___ready_for_wider_testing.html</link>
@@ -378,30 +419,5 @@ and have just a few weeks or months to make it happen.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
        </item>
        
-       <item>
-               <title>Danmark går for ODF?</title>
-               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Danmark_g__r_for_ODF_.html</link>
-               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Danmark_g__r_for_ODF_.html</guid>
-                <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
-               <description>
-&lt;p&gt;Ble nettopp gjort oppmerksom på en
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.version2.dk/artikel/13690-breaking-odf-vinder-dokumentformat-krigen &quot;&gt;nyhet fra Version2&lt;/a&gt;
-fra Danmark, der det hevdes at Folketinget har vedtatt at ODF skal
-brukes som dokumentutvekslingsformat i Staten.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;Hyggelig lesning, spesielt hvis det viser seg at de av vedtatt
-kravlisten for hva som skal aksepteres som referert i kommentarfeltet
-til artikkelen og
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.version2.dk/artikel/13693-er-ooxml-doemt-ude-her-er-kravene-til-en-offentlig-dokumentstandard&quot;&gt;en
-annen artikkel&lt;/a&gt; i samme nett-avis.  Liker spesielt godt denne:&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; Det skal demonstreres, at standarden i sin helhed kan
-implementeres af alle direkte i sin helhed på flere
-platforme.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;Noe slikt burde være et krav også i Norge.&lt;/p&gt;
-</description>
-       </item>
-       
         </channel>
 </rss>