Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / archive / 2010 / 09 / 09.rss

diff --git a/blog/archive/2010/09/09.rss b/blog/archive/2010/09/09.rss
index e7561a7138435b1910eb2e68433ab3f7d7c48db3..69d6e03338887e95e1702f99a4d627e9ddd327bd 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2010/09/09.rss
+++ b/blog/archive/2010/09/09.rss
@@ -142,5 +142,54 @@ gjøres kontinuerlig men kun regelmessing.</p>
 </description>
        </item>
        
+       <item>
+               <title>Terms of use for video produced by a Canon IXUS 130 digital camera</title>
+               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Terms_of_use_for_video_produced_by_a_Canon_IXUS_130_digital_camera.html</link>        
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Terms_of_use_for_video_produced_by_a_Canon_IXUS_130_digital_camera.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:55:00 +0200</pubDate>
+               <description>
+&lt;p&gt;A few days ago I had the mixed pleasure of bying a new digital
+camera, a Canon IXUS 130.  It was instructive and very disturbing to
+be able to verify that also this camera producer have the nerve to
+specify how I can or can not use the videos produced with the camera.
+Even thought I was aware of the issue, the options with new cameras
+are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway.  What is the
+problem, you might ask?  It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
+MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
+that is at risk.
+
+&lt;p&gt;On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
+written:&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;blockquote&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;This product is licensed under AT&amp;T patents for the MPEG-4 standard
+and may be used for encoding MPEG-4 compliant video and/or decoding
+MPEG-4 compliant video that was encoded only (1) for a personal and
+non-commercial purpose or (2) by a video provider licensed under the
+AT&amp;T patents to provide MPEG-4 compliant video.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;No license is granted or implied for any other user for MPEG-4
+standard.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/blockquote&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In short, the camera producer have chosen to use technology
+(MPEG-4/H.264) that is only provided if I used it for personal and
+non-commercial purposes, or ask for permission from the organisations
+holding the knowledge monopoly (patent) for technology used.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This issue has been brewing for a while, and I recommend you to
+read
+&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.osnews.com/story/23236/Why_Our_Civilization_s_Video_Art_and_Culture_is_Threatened_by_the_MPEG-LA&quot;&gt;Why
+Our Civilization&#39;s Video Art and Culture is Threatened by the
+MPEG-LA&lt;/a&gt;&quot; by Eugenia Loli-Queru and
+&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://webmink.com/2010/09/03/h-264-and-foss/&quot;&gt;H.264 Is Not
+The Sort Of Free That Matters&lt;/a&gt;&quot; by Simon Phipps to learn more about
+the issue.  The solution is to support the
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digistan.org/open-standard:definition&quot;&gt;free and
+open standards&lt;/a&gt; for video, like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theora.org/&quot;&gt;Ogg
+Theora&lt;/a&gt;, and avoid MPEG-4 and H.264 if you can.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
         </channel>
 </rss>