Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html

diff --git a/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html b/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html
index e398a9af8253a2d80ca13266666953a5c574b015..9864e5461883b457dc4958a24b0578c7e0a7c908 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html
+++ b/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html
@@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 <p>So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
 </div>
   
   <div class="tags">Tags: <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/debian edu">debian edu</a>, <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/english">english</a>, <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/nuug">nuug</a>.</div>