+<p>Departementet sier altså at sin anbefaling er at fingeravtrykk skal
+opptas og lagres i alle nasjonale ID-kort. Det skrives som om det
+blir valgfritt, på samme måten som det skrives passloven, der det i
+loven sier at det kan
+«<a href="https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1997-06-19-82#§6">innhentes
+og lagres i passet biometrisk personinformasjon i form av ansiktsfoto
+og fingeravtrykk (to fingre)</a>». Men på tross av bruken av «kan» i
+passloven er det innført krav om å avgi fingeravtrykk for å få et pass
+i Norge. Proposisjonen sier i tillegg i del 1 (Proposisjonens
+hovedinnhold) at ID-kortene skal være like pålitelig som pass og ha
+samme sikkerhetsnivå som pass. Departementet foreslår altså at
+ID-kortene skal gis etter samme regler som for pass.</p>
+
+<p>Formuleringene fra hovedinnholdet i proposisjonen er videreført i
+<a href="https://www.stortinget.no/no/Saker-og-publikasjoner/Publikasjoner/Innstillinger/Stortinget/2014-2015/inns-201415-243/?lvl=0">innstillingen
+fra stortingskomiteen</a>, der det konkret står «De foreslåtte reglene
+vil gi befolkningen tilbud om et offentlig utstedt identitetsbevis som
+vil være like pålitelig som passet, og mer praktisk å bruke som
+legitimasjon» og «Det nasjonale ID-kortet skal også holde samme
+sikkerhetsnivå som passet». Komiteen har altså ingen kommentarer
+eller innsigelser til dette forslaget, og gjorde i debatten da saken
+ble vedtatt det klart at dette var en god sak og at en enstemmig
+komité var glad for resultatet. Stortinget har dermed stilt seg helt
+og fullt bak departementets forslag.</p>
+
+<p>For meg er det åpenbart når en leser proposisjonen at «like
+pålitelig» og «samme sikkerhetsnivå» vil bli tolket av departementet
+som «med samme biometrisk informasjon som i passene», og departementet
+forklarer i tillegg i proposisjonen at de har tenkt at
+fingeravtrykkene «vil bli beskyttet på samme måte som fingeravtrykkene
+i passene». Jeg ser det dermed som åpenbart at den samme
+tvangsinnhentingen av fingeravtrykk som gjelder for pass vil bli
+viderført til de nasjonale ID-kortene.</p>
+
+<p>Det eneste som kan endre dette er massive protester fra
+befolkningen på at folk som ikke er mistenkt for noe kriminelt skal
+tvinges til å gi fingeravtrykket til politiet for å f.eks. kunne få
+bankkonto eller stemme ved valg. Det kunne få departementet til å
+snu. Det tror jeg ikke vil skje.</p>
+</description>
+ </item>
+
+ <item>
+ <title>Norwegian citizens now required by law to give their fingerprint to the police</title>
+ <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Norwegian_citizens_now_required_by_law_to_give_their_fingerprint_to_the_police.html</link>
+ <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Norwegian_citizens_now_required_by_law_to_give_their_fingerprint_to_the_police.html</guid>
+ <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2015 16:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
+ <description><p>5 days ago, the Norwegian Parliament decided, unanimously, that all
+citizens of Norway, no matter if they are suspected of something
+criminal or not, are
+<a href="https://www.holderdeord.no/votes/1430838871e">required to
+give fingerprints to the police</a> (vote details from Holder de
+ord). The law make it sound like it will be optional, but in a few
+years there will be no option any more. The ID will be required to
+vote, to get a bank account, a bank card, to change address on the
+post office, to receive an electronic ID or to get a drivers license
+and many other tasks required to function in Norway. The banks plan
+to stop providing their own ID on the bank cards when this new
+national ID is introduced, and the national road authorities plan to
+change the drivers license to no longer be usable as identity cards.
+In effect, to function as a citizen in Norway a national ID card will
+be required, and to get it one need to provide the fingerprints to
+the police.</p>
+
+<p>In addition to handing the fingerprint to the police (which
+promised to not make a copy of the fingerprint image at that point in
+time, but say nothing about doing it later), a picture of the
+fingerprint will be stored on the RFID chip, along with a picture of
+the face and other information about the person. Some of the
+information will be encrypted, but the encryption will be the same
+system as currently used in the passports. The codes to decrypt will
+be available to a lot of government offices and their suppliers around
+the globe, but for those that do not know anyone in those circles it
+is good to know that
+<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/nov/17/news.homeaffairs">the
+encryption is already broken</a>. And they
+<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/article/2215057/wireless/bad-guys-could-read-rfid-passports-at-217-feet--maybe-a-lot-more.html">can
+be read from 70 meters away</a>. This can be mitigated a bit by
+keeping it in a Faraday cage (metal box or metal wire container), but
+one will be required to take it out of there often enough to expose
+ones private and personal information to a lot of people that have no
+business getting access to that information.</p>
+
+<p>The new Norwegian national IDs are a vehicle for identity theft,
+and I feel sorry for us all having politicians accepting such invasion
+of privacy without any objections. So are the Norwegian passports,
+but it has been possible to function in Norway without those so far.
+That option is going away with the passing of the new law. In this, I
+envy the Germans, because for them it is optional how much biometric
+information is stored in their national ID.</p>
+
+<p>And if forced collection of fingerprints was not bad enough, the
+information collected in the national ID card register can be handed
+over to foreign intelligence services and police authorities, "when
+extradition is not considered disproportionate".</p>
+
+<p>Update 2015-05-12: For those unable to believe that the Parliament
+really could make such decision, I wrote
+<a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Blir_det_virkelig_krav_om_fingeravtrykk_i_nasjonale_ID_kort_.html">a
+summary of the sources I have</a> for concluding the way I do
+(Norwegian Only, as the sources are all in Norwegian).</p>
+</description>
+ </item>
+
+ <item>
+ <title>What would it cost to store all phone calls in Norway?</title>
+ <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/What_would_it_cost_to_store_all_phone_calls_in_Norway_.html</link>
+ <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/What_would_it_cost_to_store_all_phone_calls_in_Norway_.html</guid>
+ <pubDate>Fri, 1 May 2015 19:30:00 +0200</pubDate>
+ <description><p>Many years ago, a friend of mine calculated how much it would cost
+to store the sound of all phone calls in Norway, and came up with the
+cost of around 20 million NOK (2.4 mill EUR) for all the calls in a
+year. I got curious and wondered what the same calculation would look
+like today. To do so one need an idea of how much data storage is
+needed for each minute of sound, how many minutes all the calls in
+Norway sums up to, and the cost of data storage.</p>
+
+<p>The 2005 numbers are from
+<a href="http://www.digi.no/analyser/2005/10/04/vi-prater-stadig-mindre-i-roret">digi.no</a>,
+the 2012 numbers are from
+<a href="http://www.nkom.no/aktuelt/nyheter/fortsatt-vekst-i-det-norske-ekommarkedet">a
+NKOM report</a>, and I got the 2013 numbers after asking NKOM via
+email. I was told the numbers for 2014 will be presented May 20th,
+and decided not to wait for those, as I doubt they will be very
+different from the numbers from 2013.</p>
+
+<p>The amount of data storage per minute sound depend on the wanted
+quality, and for phone calls it is generally believed that 8 Kbit/s is
+enough. See for example a
+<a href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/voice-quality/7934-bwidth-consume.html#topic1">summary
+on voice quality from Cisco</a> for some alternatives. 8 Kbit/s is 60
+Kbytes/min, and this can be multiplied with the number of call minutes
+to get the storage requirements.</p>
+
+<p>Storage prices varies a lot, depending on speed, backup strategies,
+availability requirements etc. But a simple way to calculate can be
+to use the price of a TiB-disk (around 1000 NOK / 120 EUR) and double
+it to take space, power and redundancy into account. It could be much
+higher with high speed and good redundancy requirements.</p>
+
+<p>But back to the question, What would it cost to store all phone
+calls in Norway? Not much. Here is a small table showing the
+estimated cost, which is within the budget constraint of most medium
+and large organisations:</p>
+
+<table border="1">
+<tr><th>Year</th><th>Call minutes</th><th>Size</th><th>Price in NOK / EUR</th></tr>
+<tr><td>2005</td><td align="right">24 000 000 000</td><td align="right">1.3 PiB</td><td align="right">3 mill / 358 000</td></tr>
+<tr><td>2012</td><td align="right">18 000 000 000</td><td align="right">1.0 PiB</td><td align="right">2.2 mill / 262 000</td></tr>
+<tr><td>2013</td><td align="right">17 000 000 000</td><td align="right">950 TiB</td><td align="right">2.1 mill / 250 000</td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>This is the cost of buying the storage. Maintenance need to be
+taken into account too, but calculating that is left as an exercise
+for the reader. But it is obvious to me from those numbers that
+recording the sound of all phone calls in Norway is not going to be
+stopped because it is too expensive. I wonder if someone already is
+collecting the data?</p>
+</description>
+ </item>
+
+ <item>
+ <title>First Jessie based Debian Edu beta release</title>
+ <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/First_Jessie_based_Debian_Edu_beta_release.html</link>
+ <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/First_Jessie_based_Debian_Edu_beta_release.html</guid>
+ <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2015 14:10:00 +0200</pubDate>
+ <description><p>I am happy to report that the Debian Edu team sent out
+<a href="https://lists.debian.org/debian-edu-announce/2015/04/msg00000.html">this
+announcement today</a>:</p>
projects / homepage.git / blobdiff