<link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/</link>
<atom:link href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
+ <item>
+ <title>Pornoskannerne på flyplassene bedrer visst ikke sikkerheten</title>
+ <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Pornoskannerne_p___flyplassene_bedrer_visst_ikke_sikkerheten.html</link>
+ <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Pornoskannerne_p___flyplassene_bedrer_visst_ikke_sikkerheten.html</guid>
+ <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:45:00 +0100</pubDate>
+ <description>
+<p>Via <a href="http://webmink.com/2010/12/10/links-for-2010-12-10/">en
+blogpost fra Simon Phipps i går</a>, fant jeg en referanse til
+<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/dec/9/exposed-tsas-x-rated-scanner-fraud/">en
+artikkel i Washington Times</a> som igjen refererer til en artikkel i
+det fagfellevurderte tidsskriftet Journal of Transportation Security
+med tittelen
+"<a href="http://springerlink.com/content/g6620thk08679160/fulltext.html">An
+evaluation of airport x-ray backscatter units based on image
+characteristics</a>" som enkelt konstaterer at
+<a href="http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/?a=2389&c=124">pornoscannerne</a>
+som kler av reisende på flyplasser ikke er i stand til å avsløre det
+produsenten og amerikanske myndigheter sier de skal avsløre. Kort
+sagt, de bedrer ikke sikkerheten. Reisende må altså la ansatte på
+flyplasser <a href="http://www.thousandsstandingaround.org/">se dem
+nakne eller la seg beføle i skrittet</a> uten grunn. Jeg vil
+fortsette å nekte å bruke disse pornoskannerne, unngå flyplasser der
+de er tatt i bruk, og reise med andre transportmidler enn fly hvis jeg
+kan.</p>
+</description>
+ </item>
+
<item>
<title>Now accepting bitcoins - anonymous and distributed p2p crypto-money</title>
<link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Now_accepting_bitcoins___anonymous_and_distributed_p2p_crypto_money.html</link>
</description>
</item>
- <item>
- <title>Gnash buildbot slave and Debian kfreebsd</title>
- <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Gnash_buildbot_slave_and_Debian_kfreebsd.html</link>
- <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Gnash_buildbot_slave_and_Debian_kfreebsd.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 07:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
- <description>
-<p>Answering
-<a href="http://www.listware.net/201011/gnash-dev/67431-gnash-dev-buildbot-looking-for-slaves.html">the
-call from the Gnash project</a> for
-<a href="http://www.gnashdev.org:8010">buildbot</a> slaves to test the
-current source, I have set up a virtual KVM machine on the Debian
-Edu/Skolelinux virtualization host to test the git source on
-Debian/Squeeze. I hope this can help the developers in getting new
-releases out more often.</p>
-
-<p>As the developers want less main-stream build platforms tested to,
-I have considered setting up a <a
-href="http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/">Debian/kfreebsd</a>
-machine as well. I have also considered using the kfreebsd
-architecture in Debian as a file server in NUUG to get access to the 5
-TB zfs volume we currently use to store DV video. Because of this, I
-finally got around to do a test installation of Debian/Squeeze with
-kfreebsd. Installation went fairly smooth, thought I noticed some
-visual glitches in the cdebconf dialogs (black cursor left on the
-screen at random locations). Have not gotten very far with the
-testing. Noticed cfdisk did not work, but fdisk did so it was not a
-fatal problem. Have to spend some more time on it to see if it is
-useful as a file server for NUUG. Will try to find time to set up a
-gnash buildbot slave on the Debian Edu/Skolelinux this weekend.</p>
-</description>
- </item>
-
</channel>
</rss>