Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / Circular_package_dependencies_harms_apt_recovery.html

diff --git a/blog/Circular_package_dependencies_harms_apt_recovery.html b/blog/Circular_package_dependencies_harms_apt_recovery.html
index 2eabe6710a3136af9241fadd690da95d8d61ab80..fe1ab589bbcf0869da75fdc95ee3adaf96d9906d 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/Circular_package_dependencies_harms_apt_recovery.html
+++ b/blog/Circular_package_dependencies_harms_apt_recovery.html
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
       <div class="title">Circular package dependencies harms apt recovery</div>
       <div class="date">27th July 2010</div>
       <div class="body"><p>I discovered this while doing
-<a href="https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Automatic_upgrade_testing_from_Lenny_to_Squeeze.html">automated
+<a href="http://www.hungry.com/~pere/blog/Automatic_upgrade_testing_from_Lenny_to_Squeeze.html">automated
 testing of upgrades from Debian Lenny to Squeeze</a>.  A few packages
 in Debian still got circular dependencies, and it is often claimed
 that apt and aptitude should be able to handle this just fine, but