Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / archive / 2010 / 06 / 06.rss

diff --git a/blog/archive/2010/06/06.rss b/blog/archive/2010/06/06.rss
index 7ba3e53252fa2c0b3be3e055dc59f41fe119042e..ce3f22fff258457999cbefed69101404372c9c92 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2010/06/06.rss
+++ b/blog/archive/2010/06/06.rss
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ changes, it will not be an option for Debian Edu based on Squeeze.</p>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Idea_for_a_change_to_LDAP_schemas_allowing_DNS_and_DHCP_info_to_be_combined_into_one_object.html</guid>
                 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:35:00 +0200</pubDate>
                <description>&lt;p&gt;A while back, I
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Idea_for_a_change_to_LDAP_schemas_allowing_DNS_and_DHCP_info_to_be_combined_into_one_object.html</guid>
                 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:35:00 +0200</pubDate>
                <description>&lt;p&gt;A while back, I

-&lt;a href=&quot;http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Time_for_new__LDAP_schemas_replacing_RFC_2307_.html&quot;&gt;complained
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Time_for_new__LDAP_schemas_replacing_RFC_2307_.html&quot;&gt;complained

 about the fact&lt;/a&gt; that it is not possible with the provided schemas
 for storing DNS and DHCP information in LDAP to combine the two sets
 of information into one LDAP object representing a computer.&lt;/p&gt;
 about the fact&lt;/a&gt; that it is not possible with the provided schemas
 for storing DNS and DHCP information in LDAP to combine the two sets
 of information into one LDAP object representing a computer.&lt;/p&gt;


@@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ Windows.  This is great.&lt;/p&gt;
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Lenny__Squeeze_upgrades__removals_by_apt_and_aptitude.html</guid>
                 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:05:00 +0200</pubDate>
                <description>&lt;p&gt;My
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Lenny__Squeeze_upgrades__removals_by_apt_and_aptitude.html</guid>
                 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:05:00 +0200</pubDate>
                <description>&lt;p&gt;My

-&lt;a href=&quot;http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Automatic_upgrade_testing_from_Lenny_to_Squeeze.html&quot;&gt;testing
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Automatic_upgrade_testing_from_Lenny_to_Squeeze.html&quot;&gt;testing

 of Debian upgrades&lt;/a&gt; from Lenny to Squeeze continues, and I&#39;ve
 finally made the upgrade logs available from
 of Debian upgrades&lt;/a&gt; from Lenny to Squeeze continues, and I&#39;ve
 finally made the upgrade logs available from

-&lt;a href=&quot;http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/debian-upgrade-testing/&quot;&gt;http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/debian-upgrade-testing/&lt;/a&gt;.
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/debian-upgrade-testing/&quot;&gt;https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/debian-upgrade-testing/&lt;/a&gt;.

 I am now testing dist-upgrade of Gnome and KDE in a chroot using both
 apt and aptitude, and found their differences interesting.  This time
 I will only focus on their removal plans.&lt;/p&gt;
 I am now testing dist-upgrade of Gnome and KDE in a chroot using both
 apt and aptitude, and found their differences interesting.  This time
 I will only focus on their removal plans.&lt;/p&gt;