From eb8ff3442e46d34cea37644170167d445c5cb3b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:31:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Generated. --- ...of_popcorn_time_no___domstolkontroll_.html | 444 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 444 insertions(+) create mode 100644 blog/Ruling_ignored_our_objections_to_the_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no___domstolkontroll_.html diff --git a/blog/Ruling_ignored_our_objections_to_the_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no___domstolkontroll_.html b/blog/Ruling_ignored_our_objections_to_the_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no___domstolkontroll_.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..23718a3380 --- /dev/null +++ b/blog/Ruling_ignored_our_objections_to_the_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no___domstolkontroll_.html @@ -0,0 +1,444 @@ + + + + + Petter Reinholdtsen: Ruling ignored our objections to the seizure of popcorn-time.no (#domstolkontroll) + + + + + + +
+

+ Petter Reinholdtsen + +

+ +
+ + +
+
Ruling ignored our objections to the seizure of popcorn-time.no (#domstolkontroll)
+
13th February 2017
+

A few days ago, we received the ruling from +my +day in court. The case in question is a challenge of the seizure +of the DNS domain popcorn-time.no. The ruling simply did not mention +most of our arguments, and seemed to take everything ØKOKRIM said at +face value, ignoring our demonstration and explanations. But it is +hard to tell for sure, as we still have not seen most of the documents +in the case and thus were unprepared and unable to contradict several +of the claims made in court by the opposition. We are considering an +appeal, but it is partly a question of funding, as it is costing us +quite a bit to pay for our lawyer. If you want to help, please +donate to the +NUUG defense fund.

+ +

The details of the case, as far as we know it, is available in +Norwegian from +the NUUG +blog. This also include +the +ruling itself.

+
+ + + + +
+ + + + + +

+ Created by Chronicle v4.6 +

+ + + -- 2.47.2