From e217483d5a5111047a09f2f10baaa2b7dc3ff89e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:33:04 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] =?utf8?q?Ny=20oppf=C3=B8ring.?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

---
 blog/data/2009-04-28-patch-or-no-patch.txt | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 blog/data/2009-04-28-patch-or-no-patch.txt

diff --git a/blog/data/2009-04-28-patch-or-no-patch.txt b/blog/data/2009-04-28-patch-or-no-patch.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1f2ce861da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blog/data/2009-04-28-patch-or-no-patch.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+Title: No patch is not better than a useless patch
+Tags: english, nuug, debian
+Date: 2009-04-28 09:30
+
+<p>Julien Blache
+<a href="http://blog.technologeek.org/2009/04/12/214">claim that no
+patch is better than a useless patch</a>.  I completely disagree, as a
+patch allow one to discuss a concrete and proposed solution, and also
+prove that the issue at hand is important enough for someone to spent
+time on fixing it.  No patch do not provide any of these positive
+properties.</p>
-- 
2.47.2