From d8db7636aa36b9b58c32529f1539d29f292dcff6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:02:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Ny posting.

---
 blog/data/2009-08-08-ooxml-defects.txt | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 blog/data/2009-08-08-ooxml-defects.txt

diff --git a/blog/data/2009-08-08-ooxml-defects.txt b/blog/data/2009-08-08-ooxml-defects.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0077149f1e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blog/data/2009-08-08-ooxml-defects.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Title: ISO still hope to fix OOXML
+Tags: english, nuug, standard
+Date: 2009-08-08 14:00
+
+<p>According to <a
+href="http://twerner.blogspot.com/2009/08/defects-of-office-open-xml.html">a
+blog post from Torsten Werner</a>, the current defect report for ISO
+29500 (ISO OOXML) is 809 pages.  His interesting point is that the
+defect report is 71 pages more than the full ODF 1.1 specification.
+Personally I find it more interesting that ISO still believe ISO OOXML
+can be fixed in ISO.  Personally, I believe it is broken beyon repair,
+and I completely lack any trust in ISO for being able to get anywhere
+close to solving the problems.  I was part of the Norwegian committee
+involved in the OOXML fast track process, and was not impressed with
+Standard Norway and ISO in how they handled it.</p>
+
+<p>These days I focus on ODF instead, which seem like a specification
+with the future ahead of it.  We are working in NUUG to organise a ODF
+seminar this autumn.</p>
-- 
2.47.2