From 5031d9e9f7b3acb4320b5bb9bddc79ec20088bce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:55:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Generated. --- ..._popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html | 6 +++--- blog/archive/2009/08/08.rss | 6 +++--- blog/archive/2009/08/index.html | 6 +++--- blog/index.html | 6 +++--- blog/index.rss | 6 +++--- blog/tags/english/english.rss | 6 +++--- blog/tags/english/index.html | 6 +++--- blog/tags/nuug/index.html | 6 +++--- blog/tags/nuug/nuug.rss | 6 +++--- blog/tags/standard/index.html | 6 +++--- blog/tags/standard/standard.rss | 6 +++--- blog/tags/web/index.html | 6 +++--- blog/tags/web/web.rss | 6 +++--- 13 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/blog/Relative_popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html b/blog/Relative_popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html index 56669d030f..47e92148be 100644 --- a/blog/Relative_popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html +++ b/blog/Relative_popularity_of_document_formats__MS_Office_vs__ODF_.html @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@
2009-08-12 15:50

Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:

+and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:

diff --git a/blog/archive/2009/08/08.rss b/blog/archive/2009/08/08.rss index ad44a8142c..5dc4405d0d 100644 --- a/blog/archive/2009/08/08.rss +++ b/blog/archive/2009/08/08.rss @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ seminar this autumn.</p> Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:00 +0200 <p>Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:</P> +and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:</P> <table> <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr> diff --git a/blog/archive/2009/08/index.html b/blog/archive/2009/08/index.html index 6d9b2003f8..7eb58ab210 100644 --- a/blog/archive/2009/08/index.html +++ b/blog/archive/2009/08/index.html @@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ seminar this autumn.

Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:

+and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:

TypeODFMS Office
diff --git a/blog/index.html b/blog/index.html index 764bf0f1ad..e0fbce2b87 100644 --- a/blog/index.html +++ b/blog/index.html @@ -24,9 +24,9 @@
2009-08-12 15:50

Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:

+and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:

TypeODFMS Office
diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss index f80fd7159b..37762ce364 100644 --- a/blog/index.rss +++ b/blog/index.rss @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:00 +0200 <p>Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:</P> +and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:</P> <table> <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr> diff --git a/blog/tags/english/english.rss b/blog/tags/english/english.rss index 20ad59c5da..f0f15afb43 100644 --- a/blog/tags/english/english.rss +++ b/blog/tags/english/english.rss @@ -702,9 +702,9 @@ seminar this autumn.</p> Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:00 +0200 <p>Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:</P> +and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:</P> <table> <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr> diff --git a/blog/tags/english/index.html b/blog/tags/english/index.html index f41f9403ef..fadcea0b2f 100644 --- a/blog/tags/english/index.html +++ b/blog/tags/english/index.html @@ -929,9 +929,9 @@ seminar this autumn.

Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:

+and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:

TypeODFMS Office
diff --git a/blog/tags/nuug/index.html b/blog/tags/nuug/index.html index 5afd2316c1..aeb2f37ed2 100644 --- a/blog/tags/nuug/index.html +++ b/blog/tags/nuug/index.html @@ -2704,9 +2704,9 @@ seminar this autumn.

Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:

+and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:

TypeODFMS Office
diff --git a/blog/tags/nuug/nuug.rss b/blog/tags/nuug/nuug.rss index 8d3cf4b22e..3d4414ac95 100644 --- a/blog/tags/nuug/nuug.rss +++ b/blog/tags/nuug/nuug.rss @@ -2009,9 +2009,9 @@ seminar this autumn.</p> Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:00 +0200 <p>Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:</P> +and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:</P> <table> <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr> diff --git a/blog/tags/standard/index.html b/blog/tags/standard/index.html index c7e52a61b7..731a4c96b7 100644 --- a/blog/tags/standard/index.html +++ b/blog/tags/standard/index.html @@ -477,9 +477,9 @@ seminar this autumn.

Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:

+and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:

TypeODFMS Office
diff --git a/blog/tags/standard/standard.rss b/blog/tags/standard/standard.rss index f229300922..d91863dd1d 100644 --- a/blog/tags/standard/standard.rss +++ b/blog/tags/standard/standard.rss @@ -354,9 +354,9 @@ seminar this autumn.</p> Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:00 +0200 <p>Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:</P> +and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:</P> <table> <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr> diff --git a/blog/tags/web/index.html b/blog/tags/web/index.html index 0806e1a056..069383ff41 100644 --- a/blog/tags/web/index.html +++ b/blog/tags/web/index.html @@ -222,9 +222,9 @@ fortløpende.

Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:

+and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:

TypeODFMS Office
diff --git a/blog/tags/web/web.rss b/blog/tags/web/web.rss index 96c6243e97..41199b8215 100644 --- a/blog/tags/web/web.rss +++ b/blog/tags/web/web.rss @@ -151,9 +151,9 @@ fortløpende.</p> Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:00 +0200 <p>Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF -and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage. -I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these -results:</P> +and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA +OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using +'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:</P> <table> <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr> -- 2.47.2
TypeODFMS Office