-
Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF
-and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA
-OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using
-'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:
-
-
-Type | ODF | MS Office |
-Tekst | odt:282000 | docx:308000 |
-Presentasjon | odp:75600 | pptx:183000 |
-Regneark | ods:26500 | xlsx:145000 |
-
-
-
Next, I added a 'site:no' limit to get the numbers for Norway, and
-got these numbers:
-
-
-Type | ODF | MS Office |
-Tekst | odt:2480 | docx:4460 |
-Presentasjon | odp:299 | pptx:741 |
-Regneark | ods:187 | xlsx:372 |
-
-
-
I wonder how these numbers change over time.
-
-
I am aware of Google returning different results and numbers based
-on where the search is done, so I guess these numbers will differ if
-they are conduced in another country. Because of this, I did the same
-search from a machine in California, USA, a few minutes after the
-search done from a machine here in Norway.
-
-
-
-Type | ODF | MS Office |
-Tekst | odt:129000 | docx:308000 |
-Presentasjon | odp:44200 | pptx:93900 |
-Regneark | ods:26500 | xlsx:82400 |
-
-
-
And with 'site:no':
-
-
-Type | ODF | MS Office |
-Tekst | odt:2480 | docx:3410 |
-Presentasjon | odp:175 | pptx:604 |
-Regneark | ods:186 | xlsx:296 |
-
-
-
Interesting difference, not sure what to conclude from these
-numbers.
-