From 3a02292efc09856276908758877b1b5246064555 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 21:30:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Generated. --- ..._upgrade_without_enough_free_space_on_the_disk___.html | 8 ++++++++ blog/archive/2018/07/07.rss | 8 ++++++++ blog/archive/2018/07/index.html | 8 ++++++++ blog/index.html | 8 ++++++++ blog/index.rss | 8 ++++++++ blog/tags/debian/debian.rss | 8 ++++++++ blog/tags/debian/index.html | 8 ++++++++ blog/tags/english/english.rss | 8 ++++++++ blog/tags/english/index.html | 8 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 72 insertions(+) diff --git a/blog/Debian_APT_upgrade_without_enough_free_space_on_the_disk___.html b/blog/Debian_APT_upgrade_without_enough_free_space_on_the_disk___.html index 402f508c37..1efcb53246 100644 --- a/blog/Debian_APT_upgrade_without_enough_free_space_on_the_disk___.html +++ b/blog/Debian_APT_upgrade_without_enough_free_space_on_the_disk___.html @@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ the packages that are simply too large to unpack. Today this was 'ghc', but I have run into other large packages causing similar problems earlier (like TeX).

+

Update 2018-07-08: Thanks to Paul Wise, I am aware of two +alternative ways to handle this. The "unattended-upgrades +--minimal-upgrade-steps" option will try to calculate upgrade sets for +each package to upgrade, and then upgrade them in order, smallest set +first. It might be a better option than my above mentioned script. +Also, "aptutude upgrade" can upgrade single packages, thus avoiding +the need for using "dpkg -i" in the script above.

+

As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address 15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b.

diff --git a/blog/archive/2018/07/07.rss b/blog/archive/2018/07/07.rss index d46bf7d70f..cb41197b83 100644 --- a/blog/archive/2018/07/07.rss +++ b/blog/archive/2018/07/07.rss @@ -70,6 +70,14 @@ the packages that are simply too large to unpack. Today this was 'ghc', but I have run into other large packages causing similar problems earlier (like TeX).</p> +<p>Update 2018-07-08: Thanks to Paul Wise, I am aware of two +alternative ways to handle this. The "unattended-upgrades +--minimal-upgrade-steps" option will try to calculate upgrade sets for +each package to upgrade, and then upgrade them in order, smallest set +first. It might be a better option than my above mentioned script. +Also, "aptutude upgrade" can upgrade single packages, thus avoiding +the need for using "dpkg -i" in the script above.</p> + <p>As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address <b><a href="bitcoin:15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b">15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b</a></b>.</p> diff --git a/blog/archive/2018/07/index.html b/blog/archive/2018/07/index.html index 9522c2890b..447cdf7301 100644 --- a/blog/archive/2018/07/index.html +++ b/blog/archive/2018/07/index.html @@ -88,6 +88,14 @@ the packages that are simply too large to unpack. Today this was 'ghc', but I have run into other large packages causing similar problems earlier (like TeX).

+

Update 2018-07-08: Thanks to Paul Wise, I am aware of two +alternative ways to handle this. The "unattended-upgrades +--minimal-upgrade-steps" option will try to calculate upgrade sets for +each package to upgrade, and then upgrade them in order, smallest set +first. It might be a better option than my above mentioned script. +Also, "aptutude upgrade" can upgrade single packages, thus avoiding +the need for using "dpkg -i" in the script above.

+

As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address 15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b.

diff --git a/blog/index.html b/blog/index.html index 75f771d84e..e446b3af93 100644 --- a/blog/index.html +++ b/blog/index.html @@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ the packages that are simply too large to unpack. Today this was 'ghc', but I have run into other large packages causing similar problems earlier (like TeX).

+

Update 2018-07-08: Thanks to Paul Wise, I am aware of two +alternative ways to handle this. The "unattended-upgrades +--minimal-upgrade-steps" option will try to calculate upgrade sets for +each package to upgrade, and then upgrade them in order, smallest set +first. It might be a better option than my above mentioned script. +Also, "aptutude upgrade" can upgrade single packages, thus avoiding +the need for using "dpkg -i" in the script above.

+

As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address 15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b.

diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss index 7715f46445..d61414e404 100644 --- a/blog/index.rss +++ b/blog/index.rss @@ -70,6 +70,14 @@ the packages that are simply too large to unpack. Today this was 'ghc', but I have run into other large packages causing similar problems earlier (like TeX).</p> +<p>Update 2018-07-08: Thanks to Paul Wise, I am aware of two +alternative ways to handle this. The "unattended-upgrades +--minimal-upgrade-steps" option will try to calculate upgrade sets for +each package to upgrade, and then upgrade them in order, smallest set +first. It might be a better option than my above mentioned script. +Also, "aptutude upgrade" can upgrade single packages, thus avoiding +the need for using "dpkg -i" in the script above.</p> + <p>As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address <b><a href="bitcoin:15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b">15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b</a></b>.</p> diff --git a/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss b/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss index d656bfbd62..73f65a3589 100644 --- a/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss +++ b/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss @@ -70,6 +70,14 @@ the packages that are simply too large to unpack. Today this was 'ghc', but I have run into other large packages causing similar problems earlier (like TeX).</p> +<p>Update 2018-07-08: Thanks to Paul Wise, I am aware of two +alternative ways to handle this. The "unattended-upgrades +--minimal-upgrade-steps" option will try to calculate upgrade sets for +each package to upgrade, and then upgrade them in order, smallest set +first. It might be a better option than my above mentioned script. +Also, "aptutude upgrade" can upgrade single packages, thus avoiding +the need for using "dpkg -i" in the script above.</p> + <p>As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address <b><a href="bitcoin:15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b">15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b</a></b>.</p> diff --git a/blog/tags/debian/index.html b/blog/tags/debian/index.html index d481ed6e9e..d85296bead 100644 --- a/blog/tags/debian/index.html +++ b/blog/tags/debian/index.html @@ -87,6 +87,14 @@ the packages that are simply too large to unpack. Today this was 'ghc', but I have run into other large packages causing similar problems earlier (like TeX).

+

Update 2018-07-08: Thanks to Paul Wise, I am aware of two +alternative ways to handle this. The "unattended-upgrades +--minimal-upgrade-steps" option will try to calculate upgrade sets for +each package to upgrade, and then upgrade them in order, smallest set +first. It might be a better option than my above mentioned script. +Also, "aptutude upgrade" can upgrade single packages, thus avoiding +the need for using "dpkg -i" in the script above.

+

As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address 15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b.

diff --git a/blog/tags/english/english.rss b/blog/tags/english/english.rss index 2ae24819ab..0bf4cc0058 100644 --- a/blog/tags/english/english.rss +++ b/blog/tags/english/english.rss @@ -70,6 +70,14 @@ the packages that are simply too large to unpack. Today this was 'ghc', but I have run into other large packages causing similar problems earlier (like TeX).</p> +<p>Update 2018-07-08: Thanks to Paul Wise, I am aware of two +alternative ways to handle this. The "unattended-upgrades +--minimal-upgrade-steps" option will try to calculate upgrade sets for +each package to upgrade, and then upgrade them in order, smallest set +first. It might be a better option than my above mentioned script. +Also, "aptutude upgrade" can upgrade single packages, thus avoiding +the need for using "dpkg -i" in the script above.</p> + <p>As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address <b><a href="bitcoin:15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b">15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b</a></b>.</p> diff --git a/blog/tags/english/index.html b/blog/tags/english/index.html index 1eecc309d4..fb8db73d22 100644 --- a/blog/tags/english/index.html +++ b/blog/tags/english/index.html @@ -87,6 +87,14 @@ the packages that are simply too large to unpack. Today this was 'ghc', but I have run into other large packages causing similar problems earlier (like TeX).

+

Update 2018-07-08: Thanks to Paul Wise, I am aware of two +alternative ways to handle this. The "unattended-upgrades +--minimal-upgrade-steps" option will try to calculate upgrade sets for +each package to upgrade, and then upgrade them in order, smallest set +first. It might be a better option than my above mentioned script. +Also, "aptutude upgrade" can upgrade single packages, thus avoiding +the need for using "dpkg -i" in the script above.

+

As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address 15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b.

-- 2.47.2