X-Git-Url: http://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/db4d7a331e13d9f644d72f3c10c6e2fdec1f7a38..2d707f9199f2ca162f736edae24fb4f86ef33ddf:/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html diff --git a/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html b/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html index d36ac732d5..f6fca25230 100644 --- a/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html +++ b/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ are few options on Linux addressing all the identified issues. Both ZFS and Btrfs are doing a fairly good job, but have legal and practical issues on their own. I wonder how cluster file systems like Ceph do in this regard. After all, there is an old saying, you know -you have a distributed system when the crash of a compyter you have +you have a distributed system when the crash of a computer you have never heard of stops you from getting any work done. The same holds true if fault tolerance do not work.

@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ status to detect and replace failed disks.

  • October (5)
    • -
  • November (1)
    • +
  • November (2)
    • @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ status to detect and replace failed disks.

  • drivstoffpriser (4)
    • -
  • english (358)
    • +
  • english (359)
  • fiksgatami (23)
    • @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ status to detect and replace failed disks.

  • open311 (2)
    • -
  • opphavsrett (65)
    • +
  • opphavsrett (66)
  • personvern (104)