X-Git-Url: http://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/b7273cc23952056cd866364c81827f6571028fc0..53798080ccfe7c0d9ad356a83ded5b219b186c9b:/blog/data/2011-01-15-video-standard.txt diff --git a/blog/data/2011-01-15-video-standard.txt b/blog/data/2011-01-15-video-standard.txt index 4dfad2b7eb..6a5f02a033 100644 --- a/blog/data/2011-01-15-video-standard.txt +++ b/blog/data/2011-01-15-video-standard.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Title: The video format most supported in web browsers? -Tags: english, nuug, standard, video +Tags: english, nuug, standard, video, h264 Date: 2011-01-16 00:20
The video format struggle on the web continues, and the three @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ HTML5 video tag. Of course to reach all those without a browser handling HTML5, one need fallback mechanisms. In NUUG, we provide first fallback to a plugin capable of playing MPEG1 video, and those without such support -we have a second fallback to the Cartado java applet playing Ogg +we have a second fallback to the Cortado java applet playing Ogg Theora. This seem to work quite well, as can be seen in an example from last week.
@@ -45,3 +45,8 @@ available from the Xiph.org wiki, if you want to have a look. I'm not aware of a similar list for WebM nor H.264. + +Update 2011-01-16 09:40: A question from Tollef on IRC made me +realise that I failed to make it clear enough this text is about the +<video> tag support in browsers and not the video support +provided by external plugins like the Flash plugins.