X-Git-Url: http://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/7dff3f09e283f5a77349d4eec5a9b73260db1605..ea33f71639e9d8c75cefdf12aa412d05c9e8c1ac:/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html diff --git a/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html b/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html index e398a9af82..5cea2e20b0 100644 --- a/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html +++ b/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ - - - Petter Reinholdtsen: Broken umask handling with sshfs - - - - -
-

- Petter Reinholdtsen - -

- -
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + + + + Petter Reinholdtsen: Broken umask handling with sshfs + + + + +
+

+ Petter Reinholdtsen + +

+ +
-
-
Broken umask handling with sshfs
-
2010-08-26 13:30
-
-

My file system sematics program +

+
Broken umask handling with sshfs
+
26th August 2010
+

My file system sematics program presented a few days ago is very useful to verify that a file system can work as a unix home directory,and today I had to extend it a bit. I'm @@ -112,22 +112,76 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation

So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home directory.

+ +

Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in +BTS report #594498

+ +

Update 2010-08-27: Michael Gebetsroither report that he found the +script so useful that he created a GIT repository and stored it in +http://github.com/gebi/fs-test.

- - - -
+ + + + +
+ + + - + +
+

+ Created by Chronicle v4.4 +

+ +