X-Git-Url: http://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/7dff3f09e283f5a77349d4eec5a9b73260db1605..e0693fd13d87b07fcb42c3afcefbf57914cf3eb5:/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html diff --git a/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html b/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html index e398a9af82..c1e161ed8d 100644 --- a/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html +++ b/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home directory.
+ +Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in +BTS report #594498
@@ -145,7 +148,7 @@ directory.