X-Git-Url: http://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/60988a9c6d7d941a3eebd342aad0188c0f27031c..035c19c46c9f78dc6adf515b8418f9d0b55c709d:/blog/data/2009-08-13-google-filtype.txt

diff --git a/blog/data/2009-08-13-google-filtype.txt b/blog/data/2009-08-13-google-filtype.txt
index f82bae9818..32af5bb3cc 100644
--- a/blog/data/2009-08-13-google-filtype.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2009-08-13-google-filtype.txt
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 Title: Relative popularity of document formats (MS Office vs. ODF)
-Tags: english, nuug, standard
+Tags: english, nuug, standard, web
 Date: 2009-08-12 15:50
 
 <p>Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF
-and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage.
-I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these
-results:</P>
+and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA
+OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage.  I searched using
+'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:</P>
 
 <table>
 <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr>
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ got these numbers:</p>
 <p>I am aware of Google returning different results and numbers based
 on where the search is done, so I guess these numbers will differ if
 they are conduced in another country.  Because of this, I did the same
-search from a machine in California, USA.</p>
+search from a machine in California, USA, a few minutes after the
+search done from a machine here in Norway.</p>
 
 
 <table>