X-Git-Url: http://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/10debe066a2b5541ad45a7d533c20240c1c3e78a..7de7721e8f6df823d01e7abd4f782844c9fec4f1:/blog/index.rss diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss index a6e8a6c351..4807a46d59 100644 --- a/blog/index.rss +++ b/blog/index.rss @@ -6,6 +6,80 @@ http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/ + + Vinmonopolet bryter loven åpenlyst - og flere planlegger å gjøre det samme + http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Vinmonopolet_bryter_loven___penlyst___og_flere_planlegger____gj__re_det_samme.html + http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Vinmonopolet_bryter_loven___penlyst___og_flere_planlegger____gj__re_det_samme.html + Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:00:00 +0200 + +<p><a href="http://www.dagbladet.no/2010/06/16/nyheter/innenriks/streik/arbeidsliv/12157858/">Dagbladet +melder</a> at Vinmonopolet med bakgrunn i vekterstreiken som pågår i +Norge for tiden, har bestemt seg for med vitende og vilje å bryte +sentralbanklovens paragraf 14 ved å nekte folk å betale med +kontanter, og at flere butikker planlegger å følge deres eksempel. +Jeg synes det er hårreisende hvis de slipper unna med et slikt +soleklart lovbrudd, og lurer på hva slags muligheter jeg vil ha hvis +jeg blir nektet å handle med kontakter. Jeg handler i hovedsak med +kontanter selv, da jeg anser det som en borgerrett å kunne handle +anonymt uten at det blir registrert. For meg er det et angrep på mitt +personvern å nekte å ta imot kontakt betaling.</p> + +<p><a href="http://www.lovdata.no/all/tl-19850524-028-003.html#14">Paragrafen +i sentralbankloven</a> lyder:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>§ 14. Tvungent betalingsmiddel</p> + +<p>Bankens sedler og mynter er tvungent betalingsmiddel i Norge. Ingen +er pliktig til i én betaling å ta imot mer enn femogtyve mynter av +hver enhet.</p> + +<p>Sterkt skadde sedler og mynter er ikke tvungent +betalingsmiddel. Banken gir nærmere forskrifter om erstatning for +bortkomne, brente eller skadde sedler og mynter.</p> + +<p>Selv om en avtale inneholder klausul om betaling av en +pengeforpliktelse i gullverdi, kan skyldneren frigjøre seg med tvungne +betalingsmidler uten hensyn til denne klausul.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Det er med bakgrunn i denne lovet ikke tillatt å nekte å ta imot +kontakt betaling. Det er en lov jeg har sans for, og som jeg mener må +håndheves strengt.</p> + + + + + Officeshots taking shape + http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Officeshots_taking_shape.html + http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Officeshots_taking_shape.html + Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:40:00 +0200 + +<p>For those of us caring about document exchange and +interoperability, <a href="http://www.officeshots.org/">OfficeShots</a> +is a great service. It is to ODF documents what +<a href="http://browsershots.org/">BrowserShots</a> is for web +pages.</p> + +<p>A while back, I was contacted by Knut Yrvin at the part of Nokia +that used to be Trolltech, who wanted to help the OfficeShots project +and wondered if the University of Oslo where I work would be +interested in supporting the project. I helped him to navigate his +request to the right people at work, and his request was answered with +a spot in the machine room with power and network connected, and Knut +arranged funding for a machine to fill the spot. The machine is +administrated by the OfficeShots people, so I do not have daily +contact with its progress, and thus from time to time check back to +see how the project is doing.</p> + +<p>Today I had a look, and was happy to see that the Dell box in our +machine room now is the host for several virtual machines running as +OfficeShots factories, and the project is able to render ODF documents +in 17 different document processing implementation on Linux and +Windows. This is great.</p> + + + Lenny->Squeeze upgrades, removals by apt and aptitude http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Lenny__Squeeze_upgrades__removals_by_apt_and_aptitude.html @@ -548,85 +622,5 @@ effekt på området der?</p> - - KDM fail at boot with NVidia cards - and no one try to fix it? - http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/KDM_fail_at_boot_with_NVidia_cards___and_no_one_try_to_fix_it_.html - http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/KDM_fail_at_boot_with_NVidia_cards___and_no_one_try_to_fix_it_.html - Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:05:00 +0200 - -<p>It is strange to watch how a bug in Debian causing KDM to fail to -start at boot when an NVidia video card is used is handled. The -problem seem to be that the nvidia X.org driver uses a long time to -initialize, and this duration is longer than kdm is configured to -wait.</p> - -<p>I came across two bugs related to this issue, -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/583312">#583312</a> initially filed -against initscripts and passed on to nvidia-glx when it became obvious -that the nvidia drivers were involved, and -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/524751">#524751</a> initially filed against -kdm and passed on to src:nvidia-graphics-drivers for unknown reasons.</p> - -<p>To me, it seem that no-one is interested in actually solving the -problem nvidia video card owners experience and make sure the Debian -distribution work out of the box for these users. The nvidia driver -maintainers expect kdm to be set up to wait longer, while kdm expect -the nvidia driver maintainers to fix the driver to start faster, and -while they wait for each other I guess the users end up switching to a -distribution that work for them. I have no idea what the solution is, -but I am pretty sure that waiting for each other is not it.</p> - -<p>I wonder why we end up handling bugs this way.</p> - - - - - Parallellized boot seem to hold up well in Debian/testing - http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Parallellized_boot_seem_to_hold_up_well_in_Debian_testing.html - http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Parallellized_boot_seem_to_hold_up_well_in_Debian_testing.html - Thu, 27 May 2010 23:55:00 +0200 - -<p>A few days ago, parallel booting was enabled in Debian/testing. -The feature seem to hold up pretty well, but three fairly serious -issues are known and should be solved: - -<p><ul> - -<li>The wicd package seen to -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/508289">break NFS mounting</a> and -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/581586">network setup</a> when -parallel booting is enabled. No idea why, but the wicd maintainer -seem to be on the case.</li> - -<li>The nvidia X driver seem to -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/583312">have a race condition</a> -triggered more easily when parallel booting is in effect. The -maintainer is on the case.</li> - -<li>The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot -sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/575080">try to switch back</a> to -sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create -/etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make -sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a -workaround in sysv-rc to help those trying to move from file-rc to -sysv-rc get a working shutdown.</li> - -</ul></p> - -<p>All in all not many surprising issues, and all of them seem -solvable before Squeeze is released. In addition to these there are -some packages with bugs in their dependencies and run level settings, -which I expect will be fixed in a reasonable time span.</p> - -<p>If you report any problems with dependencies in init.d scripts to -the BTS, please usertag the report to get it to show up at -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=initscripts-ng-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org">the -list of usertagged bugs related to this</a>.</p> - -<p>Update: Correct bug number to file-rc issue.</p> - - -