Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / data / 2010-09-09-mpeg-la.txt

diff --git a/blog/data/2010-09-09-mpeg-la.txt b/blog/data/2010-09-09-mpeg-la.txt
index 068dd592eab0a4443bcf3c7ee4f13e4616350938..3919821d1d525681d3600d62785ab0274347aa34 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/data/2010-09-09-mpeg-la.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2010-09-09-mpeg-la.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Title: Terms of use for video produced by a Canon IXUS 130 digital camera
-Tags: english, nuug, fildeling, multimedia, opphavsrett, personvern, standard, video, web
+Tags: english, nuug, fildeling, multimedia, opphavsrett, personvern, standard, video, web, digistan
 Date: 2010-09-09 23:55
 
 <p>A few days ago I had the mixed pleasure of bying a new digital
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Even thought I was aware of the issue, the options with new cameras
 are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway.  What is the
 problem, you might ask?  It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
 MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
 
 <p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
 written:</p>
@@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ MPEG-4 compliant video that was encoded only (1) for a personal and
 non-commercial purpose or (2) by a video provider licensed under the
 AT&T patents to provide MPEG-4 compliant video.</p>
 
-<p>No license is granted or implied for any other user for MPEG-4
+<p>No license is granted or implied for any other use for MPEG-4
 standard.</p>
 </blockquote>
 
-<p>In short, the camera producer have choosen to use technology
+<p>In short, the camera producer have chosen to use technology
 (MPEG-4/H.264) that is only provided if I used it for personal and
 non-commercial purposes, or ask for permission from the organisations
-holding the knowledge monopoly (patent) for technices used.</p>
+holding the knowledge monopoly (patent) for technology used.</p>
 
 <p>This issue has been brewing for a while, and I recommend you to
 read