Første utkast.

[homepage.git] / blog / data / 2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt

diff --git a/blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt b/blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt
index e27f5c924a40c97c36e93efd3718cbc773e3d0ce..316145a9361bf30b6e532ff9d445fe05b9131c87 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt
@@ -1,24 +1,28 @@
 Title: IETF activity to standardise video codec
 Tags: english, frikanalen, multimedia, video
-Date: 2012-09-15 19:40
+Date: 2012-09-15 20:00
 
 <p>After the
 <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_standardize_its_first_multimedia_codec__Opus.html">Opus
 codec made</a> it into <a href="http://www.ietf.org/">IETF</a> as
 <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6716">RFC 6716</a>, I had a look
-to see if there is any activity to standardize a video codec too, and
-I was happy to discover that there is some activity in this area too.
-A non-working group mailing list
+to see if there is any activity in IETF to standardise a video codec
+too, and I was happy to discover that there is some activity in this
+area.  A non-"working group" mailing list
 <a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec">video-codec</a>
-<a href="http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/New-Non-WG-Mailing-List-video-codec-Video-codec-BoF-discussion-list-td119548.html">was
-created 2012-08-20</a>.  It is intended to discuss the topic and if a
+was
+<a href="http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/New-Non-WG-Mailing-List-video-codec-Video-codec-BoF-discussion-list-td119548.html">created 2012-08-20</a>.  It is intended to discuss the topic and if a
 formal working group should be formed.</p>
 
 <p>I look forward to see how this plays out.  There is already
 <a href="http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec/current/msg00003.html">an
 email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
-participate in that group.  Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
+participate in the ISO group.  Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
 that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
-joining that group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
-involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter anyway.</p>
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
+involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
+
+<p>If one of my readers is involved with codec work, I hope she will
+join this work to standardise a royalty free video codec within
+IETF.</p>