Ønsker meg radonmåler.

[homepage.git] / blog / archive / 2013 / 03 / 03.rss

diff --git a/blog/archive/2013/03/03.rss b/blog/archive/2013/03/03.rss
index 3f1466a744de39bd38980190cab2658ac1eda678..059f34b2eae0f85fff86ca66e9a710e1ce661a63 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2013/03/03.rss
+++ b/blog/archive/2013/03/03.rss
@@ -125,10 +125,10 @@ changed their default front from
 Gothic</a> to save money.  The Century Gothic font uses 30% less toner
 than Arial to print the same text.  In other word, you could cut your
 toner costs by 30% (or actually, increase your toner supply life time
-by more than 30%, by simply changing the default font used in your
+by more than 30%), by simply changing the default font used in your
 prints.</p>
 
-<p>But it is not quite obvious how much one will safe by switching.
+<p>But it is not quite obvious how much one will save by switching.
 The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay said it used $100,000 per year
 on ink and toner cartridges, according to
 <a href="http://www.twincities.com/ci_14833097">a report from
@@ -143,6 +143,16 @@ depend on the documents printed.</p>
 <p>But it is definitely something to consider, if you want to reduce
 the amount of trash, decrease the amount of toner used in the world,
 and save some money in the process.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2013-04-10: If you want to know how much ink/toner could be
+saved when switching between fonts, Inkfarm got a
+<a href="http://www.inkfarm.com/What-the-Font">service to calculate the
+difference between font pairs</a>.  They also
+<a href="http://www.inkfarm.com/Recommended-Ink-Saving-Fonts---">recommend
+which fonts to use</a> to save ink.  Check it out. :) While updating
+this blog post, I also came across a blog post from InkCloners,
+<a href="http://inkcloners.com/blog/ink-cartridges/change-fonts-to-save-ink-costs/">listing
+the fonts they recommend</a>, with Centory Gothic at the top.</p>
 </description>
        </item>
        
@@ -331,9 +341,9 @@ off. lovens §15.1, så det er vanskelig å vite hvordan argumentene fra
 høringen ble mottatt og forstått av saksbehandleren hos DIFI.  Lurer
 på hvordan jeg kan klage på at jeg ikke fikk se oppsummeringen.  Fikk
 tre PDFer tilsendt fra FAD,
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuug.no/pub/offentliginnsyn/from-FAD/20130115%20Notat%20FAD%20-%20EHF.pdf%20(L)(889185).pdf&quot;&gt;Endring av underversjon i EHF&lt;/a&gt;, 
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuug.no/pub/offentliginnsyn/from-FAD/Bakgrunnsnotat%20knyttet%20til%20versjon%20av%20EHF%20standarden%20i%20Forskrift%20om%20IT-standarder%20i%20offentlig%20sektor.pdf&quot;&gt;Bakgrunnsnotat knyttet til versjon av EHF standarden i Forskrift om IT-standarder i offentlig sektor&lt;/a&gt; og
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuug.no/pub/offentliginnsyn/from-FAD/Utkast%20Kongelig%20resolusjon.docx%20(L)(898064).pdf&quot;&gt;Utkast til endring av standardiseringsforskriften&lt;/a&gt;, hvis du vil ta en titt.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuug.no/pub/offentliginnsyn/from-FAD/sak-2012-2168/20130115%20Notat%20FAD%20-%20EHF.pdf%20(L)(889185).pdf&quot;&gt;Endring av underversjon i EHF&lt;/a&gt;, 
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuug.no/pub/offentliginnsyn/from-FAD/sak-2012-2168/Bakgrunnsnotat%20knyttet%20til%20versjon%20av%20EHF%20standarden%20i%20Forskrift%20om%20IT-standarder%20i%20offentlig%20sektor.pdf&quot;&gt;Bakgrunnsnotat knyttet til versjon av EHF standarden i Forskrift om IT-standarder i offentlig sektor&lt;/a&gt; og
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuug.no/pub/offentliginnsyn/from-FAD/sak-2012-2168/Utkast%20Kongelig%20resolusjon.docx%20(L)(898064).pdf&quot;&gt;Utkast til endring av standardiseringsforskriften&lt;/a&gt;, hvis du vil ta en titt.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
        </item>