<title>EU-parlamentet raner fellesskapet for musikk</title>
<link>../../../EU_parlamentet_raner_fellesskapet_for_musikk.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">../../../EU_parlamentet_raner_fellesskapet_for_musikk.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
+ <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:30:00 +0200</pubDate>
<description>
<p>Slashdot melder at EU-parlamentet har vedtatt
<a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/058-54192-111-04-17-909-20090422IPR54191-21-04-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm">å
</description>
</item>
+ <item>
+ <title>No patch is not better than a useless patch</title>
+ <link>../../../No_patch_is_not_better_than_a_useless_patch.html</link>
+ <guid isPermaLink="true">../../../No_patch_is_not_better_than_a_useless_patch.html</guid>
+ <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:30:00 +0200</pubDate>
+ <description>
+<p>Julien Blache
+<a href="http://blog.technologeek.org/2009/04/12/214">claim that no
+patch is better than a useless patch</a>. I completely disagree, as a
+patch allow one to discuss a concrete and proposed solution, and also
+prove that the issue at hand is important enough for someone to spent
+time on fixing it. No patch do not provide any of these positive
+properties.</p>
+</description>
+ </item>
+
</channel>
</rss>