- <item>
- <title>Når nynorskoversettelsen svikter til eksamen...</title>
- <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/N_r_nynorskoversettelsen_svikter_til_eksamen___.html</link>
- <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/N_r_nynorskoversettelsen_svikter_til_eksamen___.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:20:00 +0200</pubDate>
- <description><p><a href="http://www.aftenposten.no/norge/Krever-at-elever-ma-fa-annullert-eksamen-etter-rot-med-oppgavetekster-622459b.html">Aftenposten
-melder i dag</a> om feil i eksamensoppgavene for eksamen i politikk og
-menneskerettigheter, der teksten i bokmåls og nynorskutgaven ikke var
-like. Oppgaveteksten er gjengitt i artikkelen, og jeg ble nysgjerring
-på om den fri oversetterløsningen
-<a href="https://www.apertium.org/">Apertium</a> ville gjort en bedre
-jobb enn Utdanningsdirektoratet. Det kan se slik ut.</p>
-
-<p>Her er bokmålsoppgaven fra eksamenen:</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p>Drøft utfordringene knyttet til nasjonalstatenes og andre aktørers
-rolle og muligheter til å håndtere internasjonale utfordringer, som
-for eksempel flykningekrisen.</p>
-
-<p>Vedlegge er eksempler på tekster som kan gi relevante perspektiver
-på temaet:</p>
-<ol>
-<li>Flykningeregnskapet 2016, UNHCR og IDMC
-<li>«Grenseløst Europa for fall» A-Magasinet, 26. november 2015
-</ol>
-
-</blockquote>
-
-<p>Dette oversetter Apertium slik:</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p>Drøft utfordringane knytte til nasjonalstatane sine og rolla til
-andre aktørar og høve til å handtera internasjonale utfordringar, som
-til dømes *flykningekrisen.</p>
-
-<p>Vedleggja er døme på tekster som kan gje relevante perspektiv på
-temaet:</p>
-
-<ol>
-<li>*Flykningeregnskapet 2016, *UNHCR og *IDMC</li>
-<li>«*Grenseløst Europa for fall» A-Magasinet, 26. november 2015</li>
-</ol>
-
-</blockquote>
-
-<p>Ord som ikke ble forstått er markert med stjerne (*), og trenger
-ekstra språksjekk. Men ingen ord er forsvunnet, slik det var i
-oppgaven elevene fikk presentert på eksamen. Jeg mistenker dog at
-"andre aktørers rolle og muligheter til ..." burde vært oversatt til
-"rolla til andre aktørar og deira høve til ..." eller noe slikt, men
-det er kanskje flisespikking. Det understreker vel bare at det alltid
-trengs korrekturlesning etter automatisk oversettelse.</p>
-</description>
- </item>
-
- <item>
- <title>Epost inn som arkivformat i Riksarkivarens forskrift?</title>
- <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Epost_inn_som_arkivformat_i_Riksarkivarens_forskrift_.html</link>
- <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Epost_inn_som_arkivformat_i_Riksarkivarens_forskrift_.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:30:00 +0200</pubDate>
- <description><p>I disse dager, med frist 1. mai, har Riksarkivaren ute en høring på
-sin forskrift. Som en kan se er det ikke mye tid igjen før fristen
-som går ut på søndag. Denne forskriften er det som lister opp hvilke
-formater det er greit å arkivere i
-<a href="http://www.arkivverket.no/arkivverket/Offentleg-forvalting/Noark/Noark-5">Noark
-5-løsninger</a> i Norge.</p>
-
-<p>Jeg fant høringsdokumentene hos
-<a href="https://www.arkivrad.no/aktuelt/riksarkivarens-forskrift-pa-horing">Norsk
-Arkivråd</a> etter å ha blitt tipset på epostlisten til
-<a href="https://github.com/hiOA-ABI/nikita-noark5-core">fri
-programvareprosjektet Nikita Noark5-Core</a>, som lager et Noark 5
-Tjenestegresesnitt. Jeg er involvert i Nikita-prosjektet og takket
-være min interesse for tjenestegrensesnittsprosjektet har jeg lest en
-god del Noark 5-relaterte dokumenter, og til min overraskelse oppdaget
-at standard epost ikke er på listen over godkjente formater som kan
-arkiveres. Høringen med frist søndag er en glimrende mulighet til å
-forsøke å gjøre noe med det. Jeg holder på med
-<a href="https://github.com/petterreinholdtsen/noark5-tester/blob/master/docs/hoering-arkivforskrift.tex">egen
-høringsuttalelse</a>, og lurer på om andre er interessert i å støtte
-forslaget om å tillate arkivering av epost som epost i arkivet.</p>
-
-<p>Er du igang med å skrive egen høringsuttalelse allerede? I så fall
-kan du jo vurdere å ta med en formulering om epost-lagring. Jeg tror
-ikke det trengs så mye. Her et kort forslag til tekst:</p>
-
-<p><blockquote>
-
- <p>Viser til høring sendt ut 2017-02-17 (Riksarkivarens referanse
- 2016/9840 HELHJO), og tillater oss å sende inn noen innspill om
- revisjon av Forskrift om utfyllende tekniske og arkivfaglige
- bestemmelser om behandling av offentlige arkiver (Riksarkivarens
- forskrift).</p>
-
- <p>Svært mye av vår kommuikasjon foregår i dag på e-post. Vi
- foreslår derfor at Internett-e-post, slik det er beskrevet i IETF
- RFC 5322,
- <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322">https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322</a>. bør
- inn som godkjent dokumentformat. Vi foreslår at forskriftens
- oversikt over godkjente dokumentformater ved innlevering i § 5-16
- endres til å ta med Internett-e-post.</p>
-
-</blockquote></p>
-
-<p>Som del av arbeidet med tjenestegrensesnitt har vi testet hvordan
-epost kan lagres i en Noark 5-struktur, og holder på å skrive et
-forslag om hvordan dette kan gjøres som vil bli sendt over til
-arkivverket så snart det er ferdig. De som er interesserte kan
-<a href="https://github.com/petterreinholdtsen/noark5-tester/blob/master/docs/epostlagring.md">følge
-fremdriften på web</a>.</p>
-
-<p>Oppdatering 2017-04-28: I dag ble høringuttalelsen jeg skrev
- <a href="https://www.nuug.no/news/NUUGs_h_ringuttalelse_til_Riksarkivarens_forskrift.shtml">sendt
- inn av foreningen NUUG</a>.</p>
-</description>
- </item>
-
- <item>
- <title>Offentlig elektronisk postjournal blokkerer tilgang for utvalgte webklienter</title>
- <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Offentlig_elektronisk_postjournal_blokkerer_tilgang_for_utvalgte_webklienter.html</link>
- <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Offentlig_elektronisk_postjournal_blokkerer_tilgang_for_utvalgte_webklienter.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
- <description><p>Jeg oppdaget i dag at <a href="https://www.oep.no/">nettstedet som
-publiserer offentlige postjournaler fra statlige etater</a>, OEP, har
-begynt å blokkerer enkelte typer webklienter fra å få tilgang. Vet
-ikke hvor mange det gjelder, men det gjelder i hvert fall libwww-perl
-og curl. For å teste selv, kjør følgende:</p>
-
-<blockquote><pre>
-% curl -v -s https://www.oep.no/pub/report.xhtml?reportId=3 2>&1 |grep '< HTTP'
-< HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
-% curl -v -s --header 'User-Agent:Opera/12.0' https://www.oep.no/pub/report.xhtml?reportId=3 2>&1 |grep '< HTTP'
-< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
-%
-</pre></blockquote>
-
-<p>Her kan en se at tjenesten gir «404 Not Found» for curl i
-standardoppsettet, mens den gir «200 OK» hvis curl hevder å være Opera
-versjon 12.0. Offentlig elektronisk postjournal startet blokkeringen
-2017-03-02.</p>
-
-<p>Blokkeringen vil gjøre det litt vanskeligere å maskinelt hente
-informasjon fra oep.no. Kan blokkeringen være gjort for å hindre
-automatisert innsamling av informasjon fra OEP, slik Pressens
-Offentlighetsutvalg gjorde for å dokumentere hvordan departementene
-hindrer innsyn i
-<a href="http://presse.no/dette-mener-np/undergraver-offentlighetsloven/">rapporten
-«Slik hindrer departementer innsyn» som ble publiserte i januar
-2017</a>. Det virker usannsynlig, da det jo er trivielt å bytte
-User-Agent til noe nytt.</p>
-
-<p>Finnes det juridisk grunnlag for det offentlige å diskriminere
-webklienter slik det gjøres her? Der tilgang gis eller ikke alt etter
-hva klienten sier at den heter? Da OEP eies av DIFI og driftes av
-Basefarm, finnes det kanskje noen dokumenter sendt mellom disse to
-aktørene man kan be om innsyn i for å forstå hva som har skjedd. Men
-<a href="https://www.oep.no/search/result.html?period=dateRange&fromDate=01.01.2016&toDate=01.04.2017&dateType=documentDate&caseDescription=&descType=both&caseNumber=&documentNumber=&sender=basefarm&senderType=both&documentType=all&legalAuthority=&archiveCode=&list2=196&searchType=advanced&Search=Search+in+records">postjournalen
-til DIFI viser kun to dokumenter</a> det siste året mellom DIFI og
-Basefarm.
-<a href="https://www.mimesbronn.no/request/blokkering_av_tilgang_til_oep_fo">Mimes brønn neste</a>,
-tenker jeg.</p>
-</description>
- </item>
-
- <item>
- <title>Free software archive system Nikita now able to store documents</title>
- <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Free_software_archive_system_Nikita_now_able_to_store_documents.html</link>
- <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Free_software_archive_system_Nikita_now_able_to_store_documents.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
- <description><p>The <a href="https://github.com/hiOA-ABI/nikita-noark5-core">Nikita
-Noark 5 core project</a> is implementing the Norwegian standard for
-keeping an electronic archive of government documents.
-<a href="http://www.arkivverket.no/arkivverket/Offentlig-forvaltning/Noark/Noark-5/English-version">The
-Noark 5 standard</a> document the requirement for data systems used by
-the archives in the Norwegian government, and the Noark 5 web interface
-specification document a REST web service for storing, searching and
-retrieving documents and metadata in such archive. I've been involved
-in the project since a few weeks before Christmas, when the Norwegian
-Unix User Group
-<a href="https://www.nuug.no/news/NOARK5_kjerne_som_fri_programvare_f_r_epostliste_hos_NUUG.shtml">announced
-it supported the project</a>. I believe this is an important project,
-and hope it can make it possible for the government archives in the
-future to use free software to keep the archives we citizens depend
-on. But as I do not hold such archive myself, personally my first use
-case is to store and analyse public mail journal metadata published
-from the government. I find it useful to have a clear use case in
-mind when developing, to make sure the system scratches one of my
-itches.</p>
-
-<p>If you would like to help make sure there is a free software
-alternatives for the archives, please join our IRC channel
-(<a href="irc://irc.freenode.net/%23nikita"">#nikita on
-irc.freenode.net</a>) and
-<a href="https://lists.nuug.no/mailman/listinfo/nikita-noark">the
-project mailing list</a>.</p>
-
-<p>When I got involved, the web service could store metadata about
-documents. But a few weeks ago, a new milestone was reached when it
-became possible to store full text documents too. Yesterday, I
-completed an implementation of a command line tool
-<tt>archive-pdf</tt> to upload a PDF file to the archive using this
-API. The tool is very simple at the moment, and find existing
-<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fonds">fonds</a>, series and
-files while asking the user to select which one to use if more than
-one exist. Once a file is identified, the PDF is associated with the
-file and uploaded, using the title extracted from the PDF itself. The
-process is fairly similar to visiting the archive, opening a cabinet,
-locating a file and storing a piece of paper in the archive. Here is
-a test run directly after populating the database with test data using
-our API tester:</p>
-
-<p><blockquote><pre>
-~/src//noark5-tester$ ./archive-pdf mangelmelding/mangler.pdf
-using arkiv: Title of the test fonds created 2017-03-18T23:49:32.103446
-using arkivdel: Title of the test series created 2017-03-18T23:49:32.103446
-
- 0 - Title of the test case file created 2017-03-18T23:49:32.103446
- 1 - Title of the test file created 2017-03-18T23:49:32.103446
-Select which mappe you want (or search term): 0
-Uploading mangelmelding/mangler.pdf
- PDF title: Mangler i spesifikasjonsdokumentet for NOARK 5 Tjenestegrensesnitt
- File 2017/1: Title of the test case file created 2017-03-18T23:49:32.103446
-~/src//noark5-tester$
-</pre></blockquote></p>
-
-<p>You can see here how the fonds (arkiv) and serie (arkivdel) only had
-one option, while the user need to choose which file (mappe) to use
-among the two created by the API tester. The <tt>archive-pdf</tt>
-tool can be found in the git repository for the API tester.</p>
-
-<p>In the project, I have been mostly working on
-<a href="https://github.com/petterreinholdtsen/noark5-tester">the API
-tester</a> so far, while getting to know the code base. The API
-tester currently use
-<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HATEOAS">the HATEOAS links</a>
-to traverse the entire exposed service API and verify that the exposed
-operations and objects match the specification, as well as trying to
-create objects holding metadata and uploading a simple XML file to
-store. The tester has proved very useful for finding flaws in our
-implementation, as well as flaws in the reference site and the
-specification.</p>
-
-<p>The test document I uploaded is a summary of all the specification
-defects we have collected so far while implementing the web service.
-There are several unclear and conflicting parts of the specification,
-and we have
-<a href="https://github.com/petterreinholdtsen/noark5-tester/tree/master/mangelmelding">started
-writing down</a> the questions we get from implementing it. We use a
-format inspired by how <a href="http://www.opengroup.org/austin/">The
-Austin Group</a> collect defect reports for the POSIX standard with
-<a href="http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mantis.html">their
-instructions for the MANTIS defect tracker system</a>, in lack of an official way to structure defect reports for Noark 5 (our first submitted defect report was a <a href="https://github.com/petterreinholdtsen/noark5-tester/blob/master/mangelmelding/sendt/2017-03-15-mangel-prosess.md">request for a procedure for submitting defect reports</a> :).
-
-<p>The Nikita project is implemented using Java and Spring, and is
-fairly easy to get up and running using Docker containers for those
-that want to test the current code base. The API tester is
-implemented in Python.</p>
-</description>
- </item>
-
- <item>
- <title>Detecting NFS hangs on Linux without hanging yourself...</title>
- <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Detecting_NFS_hangs_on_Linux_without_hanging_yourself___.html</link>
- <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Detecting_NFS_hangs_on_Linux_without_hanging_yourself___.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
- <description><p>Over the years, administrating thousand of NFS mounting linux
-computers at the time, I often needed a way to detect if the machine
-was experiencing NFS hang. If you try to use <tt>df</tt> or look at a
-file or directory affected by the hang, the process (and possibly the
-shell) will hang too. So you want to be able to detect this without
-risking the detection process getting stuck too. It has not been
-obvious how to do this. When the hang has lasted a while, it is
-possible to find messages like these in dmesg:</p>
-
-<p><blockquote>
-nfs: server nfsserver not responding, still trying
-<br>nfs: server nfsserver OK
-</blockquote></p>
-
-<p>It is hard to know if the hang is still going on, and it is hard to
-be sure looking in dmesg is going to work. If there are lots of other
-messages in dmesg the lines might have rotated out of site before they
-are noticed.</p>
-
-<p>While reading through the nfs client implementation in linux kernel
-code, I came across some statistics that seem to give a way to detect
-it. The om_timeouts sunrpc value in the kernel will increase every
-time the above log entry is inserted into dmesg. And after digging a
-bit further, I discovered that this value show up in
-/proc/self/mountstats on Linux.</p>
-
-<p>The mountstats content seem to be shared between files using the
-same file system context, so it is enough to check one of the
-mountstats files to get the state of the mount point for the machine.
-I assume this will not show lazy umounted NFS points, nor NFS mount
-points in a different process context (ie with a different filesystem
-view), but that does not worry me.</p>
-
-<p>The content for a NFS mount point look similar to this:</p>
-
-<p><blockquote><pre>
-[...]
-device /dev/mapper/Debian-var mounted on /var with fstype ext3
-device nfsserver:/mnt/nfsserver/home0 mounted on /mnt/nfsserver/home0 with fstype nfs statvers=1.1
- opts: rw,vers=3,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,namlen=255,acregmin=3,acregmax=60,acdirmin=30,acdirmax=60,soft,nolock,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=129.240.3.145,mountvers=3,mountport=4048,mountproto=udp,local_lock=all
- age: 7863311
- caps: caps=0x3fe7,wtmult=4096,dtsize=8192,bsize=0,namlen=255
- sec: flavor=1,pseudoflavor=1
- events: 61063112 732346265 1028140 35486205 16220064 8162542 761447191 71714012 37189 3891185 45561809 110486139 4850138 420353 15449177 296502 52736725 13523379 0 52182 9016896 1231 0 0 0 0 0
- bytes: 166253035039 219519120027 0 0 40783504807 185466229638 11677877 45561809
- RPC iostats version: 1.0 p/v: 100003/3 (nfs)
- xprt: tcp 925 1 6810 0 0 111505412 111480497 109 2672418560317 0 248 53869103 22481820
- per-op statistics
- NULL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- GETATTR: 61063106 61063108 0 9621383060 6839064400 453650 77291321 78926132
- SETATTR: 463469 463470 0 92005440 66739536 63787 603235 687943
- LOOKUP: 17021657 17021657 0 3354097764 4013442928 57216 35125459 35566511
- ACCESS: 14281703 14290009 5 2318400592 1713803640 1709282 4865144 7130140
- READLINK: 125 125 0 20472 18620 0 1112 1118
- READ: 4214236 4214237 0 715608524 41328653212 89884 22622768 22806693
- WRITE: 8479010 8494376 22 187695798568 1356087148 178264904 51506907 231671771
- CREATE: 171708 171708 0 38084748 46702272 873 1041833 1050398
- MKDIR: 3680 3680 0 773980 993920 26 23990 24245
- SYMLINK: 903 903 0 233428 245488 6 5865 5917
- MKNOD: 80 80 0 20148 21760 0 299 304
- REMOVE: 429921 429921 0 79796004 61908192 3313 2710416 2741636
- RMDIR: 3367 3367 0 645112 484848 22 5782 6002
- RENAME: 466201 466201 0 130026184 121212260 7075 5935207 5961288
- LINK: 289155 289155 0 72775556 67083960 2199 2565060 2585579
- READDIR: 2933237 2933237 0 516506204 13973833412 10385 3190199 3297917
- READDIRPLUS: 1652839 1652839 0 298640972 6895997744 84735 14307895 14448937
- FSSTAT: 6144 6144 0 1010516 1032192 51 9654 10022
- FSINFO: 2 2 0 232 328 0 1 1
- PATHCONF: 1 1 0 116 140 0 0 0
- COMMIT: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-
-device binfmt_misc mounted on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc with fstype binfmt_misc
-[...]
-</pre></blockquote></p>
-
-<p>The key number to look at is the third number in the per-op list.
-It is the number of NFS timeouts experiences per file system
-operation. Here 22 write timeouts and 5 access timeouts. If these
-numbers are increasing, I believe the machine is experiencing NFS
-hang. Unfortunately the timeout value do not start to increase right
-away. The NFS operations need to time out first, and this can take a
-while. The exact timeout value depend on the setup. For example the
-defaults for TCP and UDP mount points are quite different, and the
-timeout value is affected by the soft, hard, timeo and retrans NFS
-mount options.</p>
-
-<p>The only way I have been able to get working on Debian and RedHat
-Enterprise Linux for getting the timeout count is to peek in /proc/.
-But according to
-<ahref="http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-4555/netmonitor-12/index.html">Solaris
-10 System Administration Guide: Network Services</a>, the 'nfsstat -c'
-command can be used to get these timeout values. But this do not work
-on Linux, as far as I can tell. I
-<ahref="http://bugs.debian.org/857043">asked Debian about this</a>,
-but have not seen any replies yet.</p>
-
-<p>Is there a better way to figure out if a Linux NFS client is
-experiencing NFS hangs? Is there a way to detect which processes are
-affected? Is there a way to get the NFS mount going quickly once the
-network problem causing the NFS hang has been cleared? I would very
-much welcome some clues, as we regularly run into NFS hangs.</p>
-</description>
- </item>
-
- <item>
- <title>How does it feel to be wiretapped, when you should be doing the wiretapping...</title>
- <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/How_does_it_feel_to_be_wiretapped__when_you_should_be_doing_the_wiretapping___.html</link>
- <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/How_does_it_feel_to_be_wiretapped__when_you_should_be_doing_the_wiretapping___.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:50:00 +0100</pubDate>
- <description><p>So the new president in the United States of America claim to be
-surprised to discover that he was wiretapped during the election
-before he was elected president. He even claim this must be illegal.
-Well, doh, if it is one thing the confirmations from Snowden
-documented, it is that the entire population in USA is wiretapped, one
-way or another. Of course the president candidates were wiretapped,
-alongside the senators, judges and the rest of the people in USA.</p>
-
-<p>Next, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ask the Department of
-Justice to go public rejecting the claims that Donald Trump was
-wiretapped illegally. I fail to see the relevance, given that I am
-sure the surveillance industry in USA believe they have all the legal
-backing they need to conduct mass surveillance on the entire
-world.</p>
-
-<p>There is even the director of the FBI stating that he never saw an
-order requesting wiretapping of Donald Trump. That is not very
-surprising, given how the FISA court work, with all its activity being
-secret. Perhaps he only heard about it?</p>
-
-<p>What I find most sad in this story is how Norwegian journalists
-present it. In a news reports the other day in the radio from the
-Norwegian National broadcasting Company (NRK), I heard the journalist
-claim that 'the FBI denies any wiretapping', while the reality is that
-'the FBI denies any illegal wiretapping'. There is a fundamental and
-important difference, and it make me sad that the journalists are
-unable to grasp it.</p>
-
-<p><strong>Update 2017-03-13:</strong> Look like
-<a href="https://theintercept.com/2017/03/13/rand-paul-is-right-nsa-routinely-monitors-americans-communications-without-warrants/">The
-Intercept report that US Senator Rand Paul confirm what I state above</a>.</p>
-</description>
- </item>
-