Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / index.rss

diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss
index 73e7f1e729c6a0db1dab771e4216d105d62ab154..a82e24ee108680cbf7b06239906ff3cbc31c02ac 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/index.rss
+++ b/blog/index.rss
@@ -6,6 +6,40 @@
                 <link></link>
                 <atom:link href="index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        
+       <item>
+               <title>Internet-sensur skal i retten på mandag</title>
+               <link>Internet_sensur_skal_i_retten_p___mandag.html</link>
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">Internet_sensur_skal_i_retten_p___mandag.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
+               <description>
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dagensit.no/bransje/article1757755.ece&quot;&gt;DagensIT&lt;/a&gt;
+melder at Telenor og Tono skal i retten på mandag for å diskutere
+hvorvidt Tonos krav om at Telenor skal blokkere for tilgang til The
+Pirate Bay er i tråd med norsk rett.  Det blir interessant å se
+resultatet fra den rettsaken.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Jeg bet meg dog merke i en av påstandene fra Tonos advokat Cato
+Strøm, som forteller at &quot;Pirate Bay inneholder 95 prosent ulovlig
+utlagt materiale, og å stanse tilgangen til det kan ikke kalles
+sensur&quot;.  Jeg tok en titt på
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://thepiratebay.org/&quot;&gt;forsiden til The Pirate Bay&lt;/a&gt;,
+som forteller at det pr. i dag er 1 884 694 torrenter på trackeren.
+Dette tilsvarer antall filer en kan søke blant og hente ned ved hjelp
+av The Pirate Bay.  5% av dette antallet er 94 235.  Det kan dermed
+virke som om Tonos advokat mener at det ikke er sensur å blokkere for
+tilgang til nesten 100 000 lovlige filer.  Jeg lurer på om han er
+korrekt sitert.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Lurer også på hvor 95%-tallet kommer fram.  Er det seriøs og
+etterprøvbar forskning på området som viser at dette er andelen
+ulovlige filer tilgjengelig via The Pirate Bay, eller er det
+musikkbransjenes egne tall?  De har
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/oct/06/edwyn-collins-sharing-music&quot;&gt;jo
+demonstrert&lt;/a&gt; at de ikke er i stand til å skille lovlig og ulovlig
+bruk av musikk.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
        <item>
                <title>MVA på bøker med DRM, ikke MVA på bøker uten DRM?</title>
                <link>MVA_p___b__ker_med_DRM__ikke_MVA_p___b__ker_uten_DRM_.html</link>
@@ -345,60 +379,5 @@ misvisende påstander etter i sømmene.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
        </item>
        
-       <item>
-               <title>Debian boots quicker and quicker</title>
-               <link>Debian_boots_quicker_and_quicker.html</link>
-               <guid isPermaLink="true">Debian_boots_quicker_and_quicker.html</guid>
-                <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:40:00 +0200</pubDate>
-               <description>
-&lt;p&gt;I spent Monday and tuesday this week in London with a lot of the
-people involved in the boot system on Debian and Ubuntu, to see if we
-could find more ways to speed up the boot system.  This was an Ubuntu
-funded
-&lt;a href=&quot;https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/BootPerformance/DebianUbuntuSprint&quot;&gt;developer
-gathering&lt;/a&gt;. It was quite productive.  We also discussed the future
-of boot systems, and ways to handle the increasing number of boot
-issues introduced by the Linux kernel becoming more and more
-asynchronous and event base.  The Ubuntu approach using udev and
-upstart might be a good way forward.  Time will show.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;Anyway, there are a few ways at the moment to speed up the boot
-process in Debian.  All of these should be applied to get a quick
-boot:&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;ul&gt;
-
-&lt;li&gt;Use dash as /bin/sh.&lt;/li&gt;
-
-&lt;li&gt;Disable the init.d/hwclock*.sh scripts and make sure the hardware
-   clock is in UTC.&lt;/li&gt;
-
-&lt;li&gt;Install and activate the insserv package to enable
-   &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/DependencyBasedBoot&quot;&gt;dependency
-   based boot sequencing&lt;/a&gt;, and enable concurrent booting.&lt;/li&gt;
-
-&lt;/ul&gt;
-
-These points are based on the Google summer of code work done by
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://initscripts-ng.alioth.debian.org/soc2006-bootsystem/&quot;&gt;Carlos
-Villegas&lt;/a&gt;.
-
-&lt;p&gt;Support for makefile-style concurrency during boot was uploaded to
-unstable yesterday.  When we tested it, we were able to cut 6 seconds
-from the boot sequence.  It depend on very correct dependency
-declaration in all init.d scripts, so I expect us to find edge cases
-where the dependences in some scripts are slightly wrong when we start
-using this.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;On our IRC channel for this effort, #pkg-sysvinit, a new idea was
-introduced by Raphael Geissert today, one that could affect the
-startup speed as well.  Instead of starting some scripts concurrently
-from rcS.d/ and another set of scripts from rc2.d/, it would be
-possible to run a of them in the same process.  A quick way to test
-this would be to enable insserv and run &#39;mv /etc/rc2.d/S* /etc/rcS.d/;
-insserv&#39;.  Will need to test if that work. :)&lt;/p&gt;
-</description>
-       </item>
-       
         </channel>
 </rss>