Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / data / 2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt

diff --git a/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt b/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
index 38964771ffd9ea7602a3d5b654936650cc502dd7..6a450247daaf4d46f7ff172651724b45f3d4eecc 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
@@ -39,16 +39,18 @@ books) and <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/texts">The Internet
 Archive</a> (3,641,797 books) have heaps of books without DRM, which
 can read by anyone and shared with anyone.</p>
 
-<p>Update 2012-10-23: On the evening the day the story broke, Amazon
+<p>Update 2012-10-23: This story broke in the morning on Monday. In
+the evening after the story had spread all across the Internet, Amazon
 restored the account of the user, as reported by
 <a href="http://www.digi.no/904675/helomvending-fra-amazon">digi.no</a>
 and <a href="http://nrk.no/kultur-og-underholdning/1.8368487">NRK</a>.
 Apparently public pressure work.  The story from Martin have seen
-several twitter messages per minute the last 24 hours, and is still
-drawing quote a lot of attention.  But even if the account is
-restored, the fundamental problem still exist.  I recommend reading
-two opinions from
+several twitter messages per minute the last 24 hours, which is quite
+a lot, and is still drawing a lot of attention.  But even when the
+account is restored, the fundamental problem still exist.  I recommend
+reading two opinions from
 <a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2012/10/rights-you-have-no-right-to-your-ebooks/index.htm">Simon
 Phipps</a> and
 <a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2012/10/is-amazon-playing-fair/index.htm">Glen
-Moody</a> if you want to learn more about the fundamentals.</p>
+Moody</a> if you want to learn more about the fundamentals and more
+details about the original story.</p>