Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / archive / 2012 / 09 / 09.rss

diff --git a/blog/archive/2012/09/09.rss b/blog/archive/2012/09/09.rss
index 59b0edab8590d64929227244803ef93babf216e5..27ce9b4589aa954852f02314fbec20e0cbfd1fe6 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2012/09/09.rss
+++ b/blog/archive/2012/09/09.rss
@@ -6,6 +6,38 @@
                 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/</link>
 
        
+       <item>
+               <title>IETF activity to standardise video codec</title>
+               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_activity_to_standardise_video_codec.html</link>        
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_activity_to_standardise_video_codec.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
+               <description>&lt;p&gt;After the
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_standardize_its_first_multimedia_codec__Opus.html&quot;&gt;Opus
+codec made&lt;/a&gt; it into &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ietf.org/&quot;&gt;IETF&lt;/a&gt; as
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6716&quot;&gt;RFC 6716&lt;/a&gt;, I had a look
+to see if there is any activity in IETF to standardise a video codec
+too, and I was happy to discover that there is some activity in this
+area.  A non-&quot;working group&quot; mailing list
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec&quot;&gt;video-codec&lt;/a&gt;
+was
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/New-Non-WG-Mailing-List-video-codec-Video-codec-BoF-discussion-list-td119548.html&quot;&gt;created 2012-08-20&lt;/a&gt;.  It is intended to discuss the topic and if a
+formal working group should be formed.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;I look forward to see how this plays out.  There is already
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec/current/msg00003.html&quot;&gt;an
+email from someone&lt;/a&gt; in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
+participate in the ISO group.  Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
+that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
+multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
+involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;If one of my readers is involved with codec work, I hope she will
+join this work to standardise a royalty free video codec within
+IETF.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
        <item>
                <title>IETF standardize its first multimedia codec: Opus</title>
                <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_standardize_its_first_multimedia_codec__Opus.html</link>