- <title>Is Pentagon deciding the Norwegian negotiating position on Internet governance?</title>
- <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Is_Pentagon_deciding_the_Norwegian_negotiating_position_on_Internet_governance_.html</link>
- <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Is_Pentagon_deciding_the_Norwegian_negotiating_position_on_Internet_governance_.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Tue, 3 Nov 2015 13:40:00 +0100</pubDate>
- <description><p>In Norway, all government offices are required by law to keep a
-list of every document or letter arriving and leaving their offices.
-Internal notes should also be documented. The document list (called a mail
-journal - "postjournal" in Norwegian) is public information and thanks
-to the Norwegian Freedom of Information Act (Offentleglova) the mail
-journal is available for everyone. Most offices even publish the mail
-journal on their web pages, as PDFs or tables in web pages. The state-level offices even have a shared web based search service (called
-<a href="https://www.oep.no/">Offentlig Elektronisk Postjournal -
-OEP</a>) to make it possible to search the entries in the list. Not
-all journal entries show up on OEP, and the search service is hard to
-use, but OEP does make it easier to find at least some interesting
-journal entries .</p>
-
-<p>In 2012 I came across a document in the mail journal for the
-Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications on OEP that
-piqued my interest. The title of the document was
-"<a href="https://www.oep.no/search/resultSingle.html?journalPostId=4192362">Internet
-Governance and how it affects national security</a>" (Norwegian:
-"Internet Governance og påvirkning på nasjonal sikkerhet"). The
-document date was 2012-05-22, and it was said to be sent from the
-"Permanent Mission of Norway to the United Nations". I asked for a
-copy, but my request was rejected with a reference to a legal clause said to authorize them to reject it
-(<a href="http://lovdata.no/lov/2006-05-19-16/§20">offentleglova § 20,
-letter c</a>) and an explanation that the document was exempt because
-of foreign policy interests as it contained information related to the
-Norwegian negotiating position, negotiating strategies or similar. I
-was told the information in the document related to the ongoing
-negotiation in the International Telecommunications Union (ITU). The
-explanation made sense to me in early January 2013, as a ITU
-conference in Dubay discussing Internet Governance
-(<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Telecommunication_Union#World_Conference_on_International_Telecommunications_2012_.28WCIT-12.29">World
-Conference on International Telecommunications - WCIT-12</a>) had just
-ended,
-<a href="http://www.digi.no/kommentarer/2012/12/18/tvil-om-usas-rolle-pa-teletoppmote">reportedly
-in chaos</a> when USA walked out of the negotiations and 25 countries
-including Norway refused to sign the new treaty. It seemed
-reasonable to believe talks were still going on a few weeks later.
-Norway was represented at the ITU meeting by two authorities, the
-<a href="http://www.nkom.no/">Norwegian Communications Authority</a>
-and the <a href="https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dep/sd/">Ministry of
-Transport and Communications</a>. This might be the reason the letter
-was sent to the ministry. As I was unable to find the document in the
-mail journal of any Norwegian UN mission, I asked the ministry who had
-sent the document to the ministry, and was told that it was the Deputy
-Permanent Representative with the Permanent Mission of Norway in
-Geneva.</p>
-
-<p>Three years later, I was still curious about the content of that
-document, and again asked for a copy, believing the negotiation was
-over now. This time
-<a href="https://mimesbronn.no/request/kopi_av_dokumenter_i_sak_2012914">I
-asked both the Ministry of Transport and Communications as the
-receiver</a> and
-<a href="https://mimesbronn.no/request/brev_om_internet_governance_og_p">asked
-the Permanent Mission of Norway in Geneva as the sender</a> for a
-copy, to see if they both agreed that it should be withheld from the
-public. The ministry upheld its rejection quoting the same law
-reference as before, while the permanent mission rejected it quoting a
-different clause
-(<a href="http://lovdata.no/lov/2006-05-19-16/§20">offentleglova § 20
-letter b</a>), claiming that they were required to keep the
-content of the document from the public because it contained
-information given to Norway with the expressed or implied expectation
-that the information should not be made public. I asked the permanent
-mission for an explanation, and was told that the document contained
-an account from a meeting held in the Pentagon for a limited group of NATO
-nations where the organiser of the meeting did not intend the content
-of the meeting to be publicly known. They explained that giving me a
-copy might cause Norway to not get access to similar information in
-the future and thus hurt the future foreign interests of Norway. They
-also explained that the Permanent Mission of Norway in Geneva was not
-the author of the document, they only got a copy of it, and because of
-this had not listed it in their mail journal.</p>
-
-<p>Armed with this
-knowledge I asked the Ministry to reconsider and asked who was the
-author of the document, now realising that it was not same as the
-"sender" according to Ministry of Transport and Communications. The
-ministry upheld its rejection but told me the name of the author of
-the document. According to
-<a href="https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/unga69_rapport1/id2001204/">a
-government report</a> the author was with the Permanent Mission of
-Norway in New York a bit more than a year later (2014-09-22), so I
-guessed that might be the office responsible for writing and sending
-the report initially and
-<a href="https://www.mimesbronn.no/request/mote_2012_i_pentagon_om_itu">asked
-them for a copy</a> but I was obviously wrong as I was told that the
-document was unknown to them and that the author did not work there
-when the document was written. Next, I asked the Permanent Mission of
-Norway in Geneva and the Foreign Ministry to reconsider and at least
-tell me who sent the document to Deputy Permanent Representative with
-the Permanent Mission of Norway in Geneva. The Foreign Ministry also
-upheld its rejection, but told me that the person sending the document
-to Permanent Mission of Norway in Geneva was the defence attaché with
-the Norwegian Embassy in Washington. I do not know if this is the
-same person as the author of the document.</p>
-
-<p>If I understand the situation correctly, someone capable of
-inviting selected NATO nations to a meeting in Pentagon organised a
-meeting where someone representing the Norwegian defence attaché in
-Washington attended, and the account from this meeting is interpreted
-by the Ministry of Transport and Communications to expose Norways
-negotiating position, negotiating strategies and similar regarding the
-ITU negotiations on Internet Governance. It is truly amazing what can
-be derived from mere meta-data.</p>
-
-<p>I wonder which NATO countries besides Norway attended this meeting?
-And what exactly was said and done at the meeting? Anyone know?</p>
+ <title>E-tjenesten ber om innsyn i eposten til partiene på Stortinget</title>
+ <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/E_tjenesten_ber_om_innsyn_i_eposten_til_partiene_p__Stortinget.html</link>
+ <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/E_tjenesten_ber_om_innsyn_i_eposten_til_partiene_p__Stortinget.html</guid>
+ <pubDate>Tue, 6 Sep 2016 23:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
+ <description><p>I helga kom det et hårreisende forslag fra Lysne II-utvalget satt
+ned av Forsvarsdepartementet. Lysne II-utvalget var bedt om å vurdere
+ønskelista til Forsvarets etterretningstjeneste (e-tjenesten), og har
+kommet med
+<a href="http://www.aftenposten.no/norge/Utvalg-sier-ja-til-at-E-tjenesten-far-overvake-innholdet-i-all-internett--og-telefontrafikk-som-krysser-riksgrensen-603232b.html">forslag
+om at e-tjenesten skal få lov til a avlytte all Internett-trafikk</a>
+som passerer Norges grenser. Få er klar over at dette innebærer at
+e-tjenesten får tilgang til epost sendt til de fleste politiske
+partiene på Stortinget. Regjeringspartiet Høyre (@hoyre.no),
+støttepartiene Venstre (@venstre.no) og Kristelig Folkeparti (@krf.no)
+samt Sosialistisk Ventreparti (@sv.no) og Miljøpartiet de grønne
+(@mdg.no) har nemlig alle valgt å ta imot eposten sin via utenlandske
+tjenester. Det betyr at hvis noen sender epost til noen med en slik
+adresse vil innholdet i eposten, om dette forslaget blir vedtatt, gjøres
+tilgjengelig for e-tjenesten. Venstre, Sosialistisk Ventreparti og
+Miljøpartiet De Grønne har valgt å motta sin epost hos Google,
+Kristelig Folkeparti har valgt å motta sin epost hos Microsoft, og
+Høyre har valgt å motta sin epost hos Comendo med mottak i Danmark og
+Irland. Kun Arbeiderpartiet og Fremskrittspartiet har valgt å motta
+eposten sin i Norge, hos henholdsvis Intility AS og Telecomputing
+AS.</p>
+
+<p>Konsekvensen er at epost inn og ut av de politiske organisasjonene,
+til og fra partimedlemmer og partiets tillitsvalgte vil gjøres
+tilgjengelig for e-tjenesten for analyse og sortering. Jeg mistenker
+at kunnskapen som slik blir tilgjengelig vil være nyttig hvis en
+ønsker å vite hvilke argumenter som treffer publikum når en ønsker å
+påvirke Stortingets representanter.</p
+
+<p>Ved hjelp av MX-oppslag i DNS for epost-domene, tilhørende
+whois-oppslag av IP-adressene og traceroute for å se hvorvidt
+trafikken går via utlandet kan enhver få bekreftet at epost sendt til
+de omtalte partiene vil gjøres tilgjengelig for forsvarets
+etterretningstjeneste hvis forslaget blir vedtatt. En kan også bruke
+den kjekke nett-tjenesten <a href="http://ipinfo.io/">ipinfo.io</a>
+for å få en ide om hvor i verden en IP-adresse hører til.</p>
+
+<p>På den positive siden vil forslaget gjøre at enda flere blir
+motivert til å ta grep for å bruke
+<a href="https://www.torproject.org/">Tor</a> og krypterte
+kommunikasjonsløsninger for å kommunisere med sine kjære, for å sikre
+at privatsfæren vernes. Selv bruker jeg blant annet
+<a href="https://www.freedomboxfoundation.org/">FreedomBox</a> og
+<a href="https://whispersystems.org/">Signal</a> til slikt. Ingen av
+dem er optimale, men de fungerer ganske bra allerede og øker kostnaden
+for dem som ønsker å invadere mitt privatliv.</p>
+
+<p>For øvrig burde varsleren Edward Snowden få politisk asyl i
+Norge.</p>
+
+<!--
+
+venstre.no
+ venstre.no mail is handled by 10 aspmx.l.google.com.
+ venstre.no mail is handled by 20 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com.
+ venstre.no mail is handled by 20 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com.
+ venstre.no mail is handled by 30 aspmx2.googlemail.com.
+ venstre.no mail is handled by 30 aspmx3.googlemail.com.
+
+traceroute to aspmx.l.google.com (173.194.222.27), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
+ 1 uio-gw10.uio.no (129.240.6.1) 0.411 ms 0.438 ms 0.536 ms
+ 2 uio-gw8.uio.no (129.240.24.229) 0.375 ms 0.452 ms 0.548 ms
+ 3 oslo-gw1.uninett.no (128.39.65.17) 1.940 ms 1.950 ms 1.942 ms
+ 4 se-tug.nordu.net (109.105.102.108) 6.910 ms 6.949 ms 7.283 ms
+ 5 google-gw.nordu.net (109.105.98.6) 6.975 ms 6.967 ms 6.958 ms
+ 6 209.85.250.192 (209.85.250.192) 7.337 ms 7.286 ms 10.890 ms
+ 7 209.85.254.13 (209.85.254.13) 7.394 ms 209.85.254.31 (209.85.254.31) 7.586 ms 209.85.254.33 (209.85.254.33) 7.570 ms
+ 8 209.85.251.255 (209.85.251.255) 15.686 ms 209.85.249.229 (209.85.249.229) 16.118 ms 209.85.251.255 (209.85.251.255) 16.073 ms
+ 9 74.125.37.255 (74.125.37.255) 16.794 ms 216.239.40.248 (216.239.40.248) 16.113 ms 74.125.37.44 (74.125.37.44) 16.764 ms
+10 * * *
+
+mdg.no
+ mdg.no mail is handled by 1 aspmx.l.google.com.
+ mdg.no mail is handled by 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com.
+ mdg.no mail is handled by 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com.
+ mdg.no mail is handled by 10 aspmx2.googlemail.com.
+ mdg.no mail is handled by 10 aspmx3.googlemail.com.
+sv.no
+ sv.no mail is handled by 1 aspmx.l.google.com.
+ sv.no mail is handled by 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com.
+ sv.no mail is handled by 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com.
+ sv.no mail is handled by 10 aspmx3.googlemail.com.
+ sv.no mail is handled by 10 aspmx2.googlemail.com.
+hoyre.no
+ hoyre.no mail is handled by 10 hoyre-no.mx1.comendosystems.com.
+ hoyre.no mail is handled by 20 hoyre-no.mx2.comendosystems.net.
+
+traceroute to hoyre-no.mx1.comendosystems.com (89.104.206.4), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
+ 1 uio-gw10.uio.no (129.240.6.1) 0.450 ms 0.510 ms 0.591 ms
+ 2 uio-gw8.uio.no (129.240.24.229) 0.383 ms 0.508 ms 0.596 ms
+ 3 oslo-gw1.uninett.no (128.39.65.17) 0.311 ms 0.315 ms 0.300 ms
+ 4 se-tug.nordu.net (109.105.102.108) 6.837 ms 6.842 ms 6.834 ms
+ 5 dk-uni.nordu.net (109.105.97.10) 26.073 ms 26.085 ms 26.076 ms
+ 6 dix.1000m.soeborg.ip.comendo.dk (192.38.7.22) 15.372 ms 15.046 ms 15.123 ms
+ 7 89.104.192.65 (89.104.192.65) 15.875 ms 15.990 ms 16.239 ms
+ 8 89.104.192.179 (89.104.192.179) 15.676 ms 15.674 ms 15.664 ms
+ 9 03dm-com.mx1.staysecuregroup.com (89.104.206.4) 15.637 ms * *
+
+krf.no
+ krf.no mail is handled by 10 krf-no.mail.protection.outlook.com.
+
+traceroute to krf-no.mail.protection.outlook.com (213.199.154.42), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
+ 1 uio-gw10.uio.no (129.240.6.1) 0.401 ms 0.438 ms 0.536 ms
+ 2 uio-gw8.uio.no (129.240.24.229) 11.076 ms 11.120 ms 11.204 ms
+ 3 oslo-gw1.uninett.no (128.39.65.17) 0.232 ms 0.234 ms 0.271 ms
+ 4 se-tug.nordu.net (109.105.102.108) 6.811 ms 6.820 ms 6.815 ms
+ 5 netnod-ix-ge-a-sth-4470.microsoft.com (195.245.240.181) 7.074 ms 7.013 ms 7.061 ms
+ 6 ae1-0.sto-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net (104.44.225.161) 7.227 ms 7.362 ms 7.293 ms
+ 7 be-8-0.ibr01.ams.ntwk.msn.net (104.44.5.7) 41.993 ms 43.334 ms 41.939 ms
+ 8 be-1-0.ibr02.ams.ntwk.msn.net (104.44.4.214) 43.153 ms 43.507 ms 43.404 ms
+ 9 ae3-0.fra-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net (104.44.5.17) 29.897 ms 29.831 ms 29.794 ms
+10 ae10-0.vie-96cbe-1a.ntwk.msn.net (198.206.164.1) 42.309 ms 42.130 ms 41.808 ms
+11 * ae8-0.vie-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net (104.44.227.29) 41.425 ms *
+12 * * *
+
+arbeiderpartiet.no
+ arbeiderpartiet.no mail is handled by 10 mail.intility.com.
+ arbeiderpartiet.no mail is handled by 20 mail2.intility.com.
+
+traceroute to mail.intility.com (188.95.245.87), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
+ 1 uio-gw10.uio.no (129.240.6.1) 0.486 ms 0.508 ms 0.649 ms
+ 2 uio-gw8.uio.no (129.240.24.229) 0.416 ms 0.508 ms 0.620 ms
+ 3 oslo-gw1.uninett.no (128.39.65.17) 0.276 ms 0.278 ms 0.275 ms
+ 4 te3-1-2.br1.fn3.as2116.net (193.156.90.3) 0.374 ms 0.371 ms 0.416 ms
+ 5 he16-1-1.cr1.san110.as2116.net (195.0.244.234) 3.132 ms he16-1-1.cr2.oslosda310.as2116.net (195.0.244.48) 10.079 ms he16-1-1.cr1.san110.as2116.net (195.0.244.234) 3.353 ms
+ 6 te1-2-0.ar2.ulv89.as2116.net (195.0.243.194) 0.569 ms te5-0-0.ar2.ulv89.as2116.net (195.0.243.192) 0.661 ms 0.653 ms
+ 7 cD2EC45C1.static.as2116.net (193.69.236.210) 0.654 ms 0.615 ms 0.590 ms
+ 8 185.7.132.38 (185.7.132.38) 1.661 ms 1.808 ms 1.695 ms
+ 9 185.7.132.100 (185.7.132.100) 1.793 ms 1.943 ms 1.546 ms
+10 * * *
+
+frp.no
+ frp.no mail is handled by 10 mx03.telecomputing.no.
+ frp.no mail is handled by 20 mx01.telecomputing.no.
+
+traceroute to mx03.telecomputing.no (95.128.105.102), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
+ 1 uio-gw10.uio.no (129.240.6.1) 0.378 ms 0.402 ms 0.479 ms
+ 2 uio-gw8.uio.no (129.240.24.229) 0.361 ms 0.458 ms 0.548 ms
+ 3 oslo-gw1.uninett.no (128.39.65.17) 0.361 ms 0.352 ms 0.336 ms
+ 4 xe-2-2-0-0.san-peer2.osl.no.ip.tdc.net (193.156.90.16) 0.375 ms 0.366 ms 0.346 ms
+ 5 xe-2-0-2-0.ost-pe1.osl.no.ip.tdc.net (85.19.121.97) 0.780 ms xe-2-0-0-0.ost-pe1.osl.no.ip.tdc.net (85.19.121.101) 0.713 ms xe-2-0-2-0.ost-pe1.osl.no.ip.tdc.net (85.19.121.97) 0.759 ms
+ 6 cpe.xe-0-2-0-100.ost-pe1.osl.no.customer.tdc.net (85.19.26.46) 0.837 ms 0.755 ms 0.759 ms
+ 7 95.128.105.3 (95.128.105.3) 1.050 ms 1.288 ms 1.182 ms
+ 8 mx03.telecomputing.no (95.128.105.102) 0.717 ms 0.703 ms 0.692 ms
+
+-->