Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / data / 2010-12-27-open-standard.txt

diff --git a/blog/data/2010-12-27-open-standard.txt b/blog/data/2010-12-27-open-standard.txt
index 94825845a4e9963415d3f275a252f1c31f6bc6f6..ae29973f3c7302d803e817b46162d8d52dd70213 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/data/2010-12-27-open-standard.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2010-12-27-open-standard.txt
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 Title: The many definitions of a open standard
-Tags: english, standard
+Tags: english, standard, digistan
 Date: 2010-12-27 14:45
 
 <p>One of the reasons I like the Digistan definition of
 "<a href="http://www.digistan.org/open-standard:definition">Free and
 Open Standard</a>" is that this is a new term, and thus the meaning of
 the term has been decided by Digistan.  The term "Open Standard" has
-become so misunderstood that it is no longer useful very when talking
+become so misunderstood that it is no longer very useful when talking
 about standards.  One end up discussing which definition is the best
 one and with such frame the only one gaining are the proponents of
 de-facto standards and proprietary solutions.</p>
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ free basis.</li>
 </ul>
 </blockquote>
 
-<p>Another one originates from by friends over at
+<p>Another one originates from my friends over at
 <a href="http://www.dkuug.dk/">DKUUG</a>, who coined and gathered
 support for <a href="http://www.aaben-standard.dk/">this
 definition</a> in 2004.  It even made it into the Danish parlament as