Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / index.rss

diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss
index 71b5d8029a97c50ce24f7b47be7d42cdac3e7c15..a52a105d480f40d376a669bff729996a8b01a396 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/index.rss
+++ b/blog/index.rss
@@ -6,6 +6,40 @@
                 <link></link>
                 <atom:link href="index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        
+       <item>
+               <title>Hvor flyter Microsofts penger?</title>
+               <link>Hvor_flyter_Microsofts_penger_.html</link>
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">Hvor_flyter_Microsofts_penger_.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:10:00 +0200</pubDate>
+               <description>
+&lt;p&gt;Dagens nyhet er at omsetningen til Microsoft for første gang er
+synkende.  Ikke spesielt uventet med den generelle nedgangen i
+økonomien som vi ser verden over.  Det fikk meg dog til å tenke på en
+ting fra noen år tilbake.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Da jeg besøkte en kamerat i Beijing sommeren 2000, ble jeg fortalt
+at påstanden til Microsoft om at de brakte inn enorme pengesummer til
+USA nok var litt overdrevet, da de fleste inntektene fra lisenssalg
+rundt om i verden ble kanalisert inn til skatteparadiset
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayman_Islands&quot;&gt;Cayman
+Island&lt;/a&gt;.  Jeg har aldri lykkes med å få bekreftet dette påstanden,
+men tok i dag en titt på hvilke selskaper som eier de norske delene av
+Microsoft som jeg kjenner til, dvs.
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.proff.no/proff/search/companyRoles.c?freeText=microsoft&amp;bc=0&amp;c=Z001YP4Y&amp;org=957485030&quot;&gt;Microsoft
+Norge AS&lt;/a&gt; og
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.proff.no/proff/search/companyRoles.c?freeText=fast&amp;bc=348&amp;c=Z0HR5KDT&amp;org=979158831&quot;&gt;FAST,
+A Microsoft Subsidiary&lt;/a&gt; (tidligere FAST Search &amp; Transfer ASA).&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Førstnevnte er eid av &quot;Microsoft International Holdings Spain
+S.R.L.&quot;, mens sistnevnte i følge Wikipedia nå eies av
+Microsoft-underselskapet &quot;MACS Holdings Limited&quot;.  Jeg har ikke klart
+å finne mer informasjon om noen av disse.  Mon tro om noen av dem
+sender pengene til Cayman Island?  Finner det jeg tror er
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informacion-empresas.com/Empresa_MICROSOFT-INTERNATIONAL-HOLDINGS-SPAIN.html&quot;&gt;informasjon
+om spaniaselskapet på spansk&lt;/a&gt;, men jeg kan ikke lese spansk. :(&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
        <item>
                <title>Hvorfor jeg ikke bruker eFaktura</title>
                <link>Hvorfor_jeg_ikke_bruker_eFaktura.html</link>
@@ -318,46 +352,5 @@ now. :)&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
        </item>
        
-       <item>
-               <title>Time for new  LDAP schemas replacing RFC 2307?</title>
-               <link>Time_for_new__LDAP_schemas_replacing_RFC_2307_.html</link>
-               <guid isPermaLink="true">Time_for_new__LDAP_schemas_replacing_RFC_2307_.html</guid>
-                <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:30:00 +0200</pubDate>
-               <description>
-&lt;p&gt;The state of standardized LDAP schemas on Linux is far from
-optimal.  There is RFC 2307 documenting one way to store NIS maps in
-LDAP, and a modified version of this normally called RFC 2307bis, with
-some modifications to be compatible with Active Directory.  The RFC
-specification handle the content of a lot of system databases, but do
-not handle DNS zones and DHCP configuration.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skolelinux.org/&quot;&gt;Debian Edu/Skolelinux&lt;/a&gt;,
-we would like to store information about users, SMB clients/hosts,
-filegroups, netgroups (users and hosts), DHCP and DNS configuration,
-and LTSP configuration in LDAP.  These objects have a lot in common,
-but with the current LDAP schemas it is not possible to have one
-object per entity.  For example, one need to have at least three LDAP
-objects for a given computer, one with the SMB related stuff, one with
-DNS information and another with DHCP information.  The schemas
-provided for DNS and DHCP are impossible to combine into one LDAP
-object.  In addition, it is impossible to implement quick queries for
-netgroup membership, because of the way NIS triples are implemented.
-It just do not scale.  I believe it is time for a few RFC
-specifications to cleam up this mess.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;I would like to have one LDAP object representing each computer in
-the network, and this object can then keep the SMB (ie host key), DHCP
-(mac address/name) and DNS (name/IP address) settings in one place.
-It need to be efficently stored to make sure it scale well.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;I would also like to have a quick way to map from a user or
-computer and to the net group this user or computer is a member.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;Active Directory have done a better job than unix heads like myself
-in this regard, and the unix side need to catch up.  Time to start a
-new IETF work group?&lt;/p&gt;
-</description>
-       </item>
-       
         </channel>
 </rss>