Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / index.html

diff --git a/blog/index.html b/blog/index.html
index 7e4567a91b314b85b2fb26e78c442ce15d4ed3e4..fd72fcc9008c7b5ba212bbe246dbcaa0c210d460 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/index.html
+++ b/blog/index.html
@@ -19,6 +19,46 @@
 
 
  
 
 
  

+ <div class="entry">
+  <div class="title"><a href="Hvor_flyter_Microsofts_penger_.html">Hvor flyter Microsofts penger?</a></div>
+  <div class="date">2009-04-24 11:10</div>
+  <div class="body">
+<p>Dagens nyhet er at omsetningen til Microsoft for første gang er
+synkende.  Ikke spesielt uventet med den generelle nedgangen i
+økonomien som vi ser verden over.  Det fikk meg dog til å tenke på en
+ting fra noen år tilbake.</p>
+
+<p>Da jeg besøkte en kamerat i Beijing sommeren 2000, ble jeg fortalt
+at påstanden til Microsoft om at de brakte inn enorme pengesummer til
+USA nok var litt overdrevet, da de fleste inntektene fra lisenssalg
+rundt om i verden ble kanalisert inn til skatteparadiset
+<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayman_Islands">Cayman
+Island</a>.  Jeg har aldri lykkes med å få bekreftet dette påstanden,
+men tok i dag en titt på hvilke selskaper som eier de norske delene av
+Microsoft som jeg kjenner til, dvs.
+<a href="http://www.proff.no/proff/search/companyRoles.c?freeText=microsoft&bc=0&c=Z001YP4Y&org=957485030">Microsoft
+Norge AS</a> og
+<a href="http://www.proff.no/proff/search/companyRoles.c?freeText=fast&bc=348&c=Z0HR5KDT&org=979158831">FAST,
+A Microsoft Subsidiary</a> (tidligere FAST Search & Transfer ASA).</p>
+
+<p>Førstnevnte er eid av "Microsoft International Holdings Spain
+S.R.L.", mens sistnevnte i følge Wikipedia nå eies av
+Microsoft-underselskapet "MACS Holdings Limited".  Jeg har ikke klart
+å finne mer informasjon om noen av disse.  Mon tro om noen av dem
+sender pengene til Cayman Island?  Finner det jeg tror er
+<a href="http://www.informacion-empresas.com/Empresa_MICROSOFT-INTERNATIONAL-HOLDINGS-SPAIN.html">informasjon
+om spaniaselskapet på spansk</a>, men jeg kan ikke lese spansk. :(</p>
+</div>
+  <div class="tags">
+   
+
+   
+   Tags: <a href="tags/norsk">norsk</a>, <a href="tags/nuug">nuug</a>. 
+  
+  </div>
+ </div>
+ <div class="padding"></div>
+ 

  <div class="entry">
   <div class="title"><a href="Hvorfor_jeg_ikke_bruker_eFaktura.html">Hvorfor jeg ikke bruker eFaktura</a></div>
   <div class="date">2009-04-23 23:00</div>
  <div class="entry">
   <div class="title"><a href="Hvorfor_jeg_ikke_bruker_eFaktura.html">Hvorfor jeg ikke bruker eFaktura</a></div>
   <div class="date">2009-04-23 23:00</div>


@@ -379,53 +419,6 @@ now. :)</p>
    
 
    
    
 
    

-   Tags: <a href="tags/debian">debian</a>, <a href="tags/debian edu">debian edu</a>, <a href="tags/english">english</a>, <a href="tags/nuug">nuug</a>. 
-  
-  </div>
- </div>
- <div class="padding"></div>
- 
- <div class="entry">
-  <div class="title"><a href="Time_for_new__LDAP_schemas_replacing_RFC_2307_.html">Time for new  LDAP schemas replacing RFC 2307?</a></div>
-  <div class="date">2009-03-29 20:30</div>
-  <div class="body">
-<p>The state of standardized LDAP schemas on Linux is far from
-optimal.  There is RFC 2307 documenting one way to store NIS maps in
-LDAP, and a modified version of this normally called RFC 2307bis, with
-some modifications to be compatible with Active Directory.  The RFC
-specification handle the content of a lot of system databases, but do
-not handle DNS zones and DHCP configuration.</p>
-
-<p>In <a href="http://www.skolelinux.org/">Debian Edu/Skolelinux</a>,
-we would like to store information about users, SMB clients/hosts,
-filegroups, netgroups (users and hosts), DHCP and DNS configuration,
-and LTSP configuration in LDAP.  These objects have a lot in common,
-but with the current LDAP schemas it is not possible to have one
-object per entity.  For example, one need to have at least three LDAP
-objects for a given computer, one with the SMB related stuff, one with
-DNS information and another with DHCP information.  The schemas
-provided for DNS and DHCP are impossible to combine into one LDAP
-object.  In addition, it is impossible to implement quick queries for
-netgroup membership, because of the way NIS triples are implemented.
-It just do not scale.  I believe it is time for a few RFC
-specifications to cleam up this mess.</p>
-
-<p>I would like to have one LDAP object representing each computer in
-the network, and this object can then keep the SMB (ie host key), DHCP
-(mac address/name) and DNS (name/IP address) settings in one place.
-It need to be efficently stored to make sure it scale well.</p>
-
-<p>I would also like to have a quick way to map from a user or
-computer and to the net group this user or computer is a member.</p>
-
-<p>Active Directory have done a better job than unix heads like myself
-in this regard, and the unix side need to catch up.  Time to start a
-new IETF work group?</p>
-</div>
-  <div class="tags">
-   
-
-   

    Tags: <a href="tags/debian">debian</a>, <a href="tags/debian edu">debian edu</a>, <a href="tags/english">english</a>, <a href="tags/nuug">nuug</a>. 
   
   </div>
    Tags: <a href="tags/debian">debian</a>, <a href="tags/debian edu">debian edu</a>, <a href="tags/english">english</a>, <a href="tags/nuug">nuug</a>. 
   
   </div>


@@ -452,7 +445,7 @@ new IETF work group?</p>
 
 <li><a href="archive/2009/03/">March (12)</a></li>
 
 
 <li><a href="archive/2009/03/">March (12)</a></li>
 

-<li><a href="archive/2009/04/">April (7)</a></li>
+<li><a href="archive/2009/04/">April (8)</a></li>

 
 </ul></li>
 
 
 </ul></li>
 


@@ -492,9 +485,9 @@ new IETF work group?</p>
 
  <li><a href="tags/multimedia">multimedia (2)</a></li>
 
 
  <li><a href="tags/multimedia">multimedia (2)</a></li>
 

- <li><a href="tags/norsk">norsk (37)</a></li>
+ <li><a href="tags/norsk">norsk (38)</a></li>

 
 

- <li><a href="tags/nuug">nuug (36)</a></li>
+ <li><a href="tags/nuug">nuug (37)</a></li>

 
  <li><a href="tags/personvern">personvern (5)</a></li>
 
 
  <li><a href="tags/personvern">personvern (5)</a></li>