Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / archive / 2017 / 02 / 02.rss

diff --git a/blog/archive/2017/02/02.rss b/blog/archive/2017/02/02.rss
index e4c8131cad9d3d45710874cc6f4d11189d29b426..55ca5b3098dd9bdbb63027039628fb9648102e31 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2017/02/02.rss
+++ b/blog/archive/2017/02/02.rss
@@ -6,6 +6,63 @@
                 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/</link>
 
        
+       <item>
+               <title>Detect OOXML files with undefined behaviour?</title>
+               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Detect_OOXML_files_with_undefined_behaviour_.html</link>        
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Detect_OOXML_files_with_undefined_behaviour_.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
+               <description>&lt;p&gt;I just noticed
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arkivrad.no/aktuelt/riksarkivarens-forskrift-pa-horing&quot;&gt;the
+new Norwegian proposal for archiving rules in the goverment&lt;/a&gt; list
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm&quot;&gt;ECMA-376&lt;/a&gt;
+/ ISO/IEC 29500 (aka OOXML) as valid formats to put in long term
+storage.  Luckily such files will only be accepted based on
+pre-approval from the National Archive.  Allowing OOXML files to be
+used for long term storage might seem like a good idea as long as we
+forget that there are plenty of ways for a &quot;valid&quot; OOXML document to
+have content with no defined interpretation in the standard, which
+lead to a question and an idea.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Is there any tool to detect if a OOXML document depend on such
+undefined behaviour?  It would be useful for the National Archive (and
+anyone else interested in verifying that a document is well defined)
+to have such tool available when considering to approve the use of
+OOXML.  I&#39;m aware of the
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/arlm/officeotron/&quot;&gt;officeotron OOXML
+validator&lt;/a&gt;, but do not know how complete it is nor if it will
+report use of undefined behaviour.  Are there other similar tools
+available?  Please send me an email if you know of any such tool.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
+       <item>
+               <title>Ruling ignored our objections to the seizure of popcorn-time.no (#domstolkontroll)</title>
+               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Ruling_ignored_our_objections_to_the_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no___domstolkontroll_.html</link>        
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Ruling_ignored_our_objections_to_the_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no___domstolkontroll_.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
+               <description>&lt;p&gt;A few days ago, we received the ruling from
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/A_day_in_court_challenging_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no_for__domstolkontroll.html&quot;&gt;my
+day in court&lt;/a&gt;.  The case in question is a challenge of the seizure
+of the DNS domain popcorn-time.no.  The ruling simply did not mention
+most of our arguments, and seemed to take everything ØKOKRIM said at
+face value, ignoring our demonstration and explanations.  But it is
+hard to tell for sure, as we still have not seen most of the documents
+in the case and thus were unprepared and unable to contradict several
+of the claims made in court by the opposition.  We are considering an
+appeal, but it is partly a question of funding, as it is costing us
+quite a bit to pay for our lawyer.  If you want to help, please
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuug.no/dns-beslag-donasjon.shtml&quot;&gt;donate to the
+NUUG defense fund&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The details of the case, as far as we know it, is available in
+Norwegian from
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nuug.no/news/tags/dns-domenebeslag/&quot;&gt;the NUUG
+blog&lt;/a&gt;.  This also include
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nuug.no/news/Avslag_etter_rettslig_h_ring_om_DNS_beslaget___vurderer_veien_videre.shtml&quot;&gt;the
+ruling itself&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
        <item>
                <title>A day in court challenging seizure of popcorn-time.no for #domstolkontroll</title>
                <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/A_day_in_court_challenging_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no_for__domstolkontroll.html</link>        
@@ -26,7 +83,7 @@ Eriksen and NUUG board member Petter Reinholdtsen.&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.domstol.no/no/Enkelt-domstol/follo-tingrett/Nar-gar-rettssaken/Beramming/?cid=AAAA1701301512081262234UJFBVEZZZZZEJBAvtale&quot;&gt;The
 case at hand&lt;/a&gt; is that the Norwegian National Authority for
 Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime (aka
-Økokrim) decided on their own, to seizure a DNS domain early last
+Økokrim) decided on their own, to seize a DNS domain early last
 year, without following
 &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.norid.no/no/regelverk/navnepolitikk/#link12&quot;&gt;the
 official policy of the Norwegian DNS authority&lt;/a&gt; which require a
@@ -78,7 +135,7 @@ the NUUG defense fund&lt;/a&gt;.  Both Bitcoin and bank transfer are
 available. If NUUG get more than we need for the legal action (very
 unlikely), the rest will be spend promoting free software, open
 standards and unix-like operating systems in Norway, so no matter what
-happen the money will be put to good use.&lt;/p&gt;
+happens the money will be put to good use.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;If you want to lean more about the case, I recommend you check out
 &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nuug.no/news/tags/dns-domenebeslag/&quot;&gt;the blog