Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / archive / 2012 / 04 / index.html

diff --git a/blog/archive/2012/04/index.html b/blog/archive/2012/04/index.html
index d89d672756227299d0268bc8bfd542148c2a785c..ce2e64c8771502ea812a7e6f20beb50fc4287a73 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2012/04/index.html
+++ b/blog/archive/2012/04/index.html
@@ -539,6 +539,16 @@ from Simon Phipps
 (<a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2010/11/rand-not-so-reasonable/">RAND:
 Not So Reasonable?</a>).</p>
 
+<p>Update 2012-04-21: Just came across a
+<a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2012/04/of-microsoft-netscape-patents-and-open-standards/index.htm">blog
+post from Glyn Moody</a> over at Computer World UK warning about the
+same issue, and urging people to speak out to the UK government.  I
+can only urge Norwegian users to do the same for
+<a href="http://www.standard.difi.no/hoyring/hoyring-om-nye-anbefalte-it-standarder">the
+hearing taking place at the moment</a> (respond before 2012-04-27).
+It proposes to require video conferencing standards including
+specifications with RAND terms.</p>
+
       </div>
       <div class="tags">