Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / Broken_hard_link_handling_with_sshfs.html

diff --git a/blog/Broken_hard_link_handling_with_sshfs.html b/blog/Broken_hard_link_handling_with_sshfs.html
index 5ecb46b05a0d146f35f63cfb99657a0599ecc2ee..d451527b0b6317ff8e2cc279ee2c0d502fb0217e 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/Broken_hard_link_handling_with_sshfs.html
+++ b/blog/Broken_hard_link_handling_with_sshfs.html
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
       <div class="title">Broken hard link handling with sshfs</div>
       <div class="date">30th August 2010</div>
       <div class="body"><p>Just got an email from Tobias Gruetzmacher as a followup on my
-<a href="https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html">previous
+<a href="http://www.hungry.com/~pere/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html">previous
 post about sshfs</a>.  He reported another problem with sshfs.  It
 fail to handle hard links properly.  A simple way to spot this is to
 look at the . and .. entries in the directory tree.  These should have