Add link to CasparCG too.

[homepage.git] / blog / archive / 2017 / 02 / 02.rss

diff --git a/blog/archive/2017/02/02.rss b/blog/archive/2017/02/02.rss
index d865125a1a4ff7cbf891dd795f98146f93ae0d49..55ca5b3098dd9bdbb63027039628fb9648102e31 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2017/02/02.rss
+++ b/blog/archive/2017/02/02.rss
@@ -6,6 +6,63 @@
                 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/</link>
 
        
+       <item>
+               <title>Detect OOXML files with undefined behaviour?</title>
+               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Detect_OOXML_files_with_undefined_behaviour_.html</link>        
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Detect_OOXML_files_with_undefined_behaviour_.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
+               <description>&lt;p&gt;I just noticed
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arkivrad.no/aktuelt/riksarkivarens-forskrift-pa-horing&quot;&gt;the
+new Norwegian proposal for archiving rules in the goverment&lt;/a&gt; list
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm&quot;&gt;ECMA-376&lt;/a&gt;
+/ ISO/IEC 29500 (aka OOXML) as valid formats to put in long term
+storage.  Luckily such files will only be accepted based on
+pre-approval from the National Archive.  Allowing OOXML files to be
+used for long term storage might seem like a good idea as long as we
+forget that there are plenty of ways for a &quot;valid&quot; OOXML document to
+have content with no defined interpretation in the standard, which
+lead to a question and an idea.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Is there any tool to detect if a OOXML document depend on such
+undefined behaviour?  It would be useful for the National Archive (and
+anyone else interested in verifying that a document is well defined)
+to have such tool available when considering to approve the use of
+OOXML.  I&#39;m aware of the
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/arlm/officeotron/&quot;&gt;officeotron OOXML
+validator&lt;/a&gt;, but do not know how complete it is nor if it will
+report use of undefined behaviour.  Are there other similar tools
+available?  Please send me an email if you know of any such tool.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
+       <item>
+               <title>Ruling ignored our objections to the seizure of popcorn-time.no (#domstolkontroll)</title>
+               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Ruling_ignored_our_objections_to_the_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no___domstolkontroll_.html</link>        
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Ruling_ignored_our_objections_to_the_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no___domstolkontroll_.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
+               <description>&lt;p&gt;A few days ago, we received the ruling from
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/A_day_in_court_challenging_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no_for__domstolkontroll.html&quot;&gt;my
+day in court&lt;/a&gt;.  The case in question is a challenge of the seizure
+of the DNS domain popcorn-time.no.  The ruling simply did not mention
+most of our arguments, and seemed to take everything ØKOKRIM said at
+face value, ignoring our demonstration and explanations.  But it is
+hard to tell for sure, as we still have not seen most of the documents
+in the case and thus were unprepared and unable to contradict several
+of the claims made in court by the opposition.  We are considering an
+appeal, but it is partly a question of funding, as it is costing us
+quite a bit to pay for our lawyer.  If you want to help, please
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuug.no/dns-beslag-donasjon.shtml&quot;&gt;donate to the
+NUUG defense fund&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The details of the case, as far as we know it, is available in
+Norwegian from
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nuug.no/news/tags/dns-domenebeslag/&quot;&gt;the NUUG
+blog&lt;/a&gt;.  This also include
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nuug.no/news/Avslag_etter_rettslig_h_ring_om_DNS_beslaget___vurderer_veien_videre.shtml&quot;&gt;the
+ruling itself&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
        <item>
                <title>A day in court challenging seizure of popcorn-time.no for #domstolkontroll</title>
                <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/A_day_in_court_challenging_seizure_of_popcorn_time_no_for__domstolkontroll.html</link>