Typo.

[homepage.git] / blog / index.rss

diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss
index a6e8a6c3512f806ac5eebd99ef72d2ca1ec94e24..4807a46d59fd2d1b7aabbaf84bcd7b2baf18cc28 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/index.rss
+++ b/blog/index.rss
@@ -6,6 +6,80 @@
                 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/</link>
                 <atom:link href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        
                 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/</link>
                 <atom:link href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        

+       <item>
+               <title>Vinmonopolet bryter loven åpenlyst - og flere planlegger å gjøre det samme</title>
+               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Vinmonopolet_bryter_loven___penlyst___og_flere_planlegger____gj__re_det_samme.html</link>
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Vinmonopolet_bryter_loven___penlyst___og_flere_planlegger____gj__re_det_samme.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
+               <description>
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dagbladet.no/2010/06/16/nyheter/innenriks/streik/arbeidsliv/12157858/&quot;&gt;Dagbladet
+melder&lt;/a&gt; at Vinmonopolet med bakgrunn i vekterstreiken som pågår i
+Norge for tiden, har bestemt seg for med vitende og vilje å bryte
+sentralbanklovens paragraf 14 ved å nekte folk å betale med
+kontanter, og at flere butikker planlegger å følge deres eksempel.
+Jeg synes det er hårreisende hvis de slipper unna med et slikt
+soleklart lovbrudd, og lurer på hva slags muligheter jeg vil ha hvis
+jeg blir nektet å handle med kontakter.  Jeg handler i hovedsak med
+kontanter selv, da jeg anser det som en borgerrett å kunne handle
+anonymt uten at det blir registrert.  For meg er det et angrep på mitt
+personvern å nekte å ta imot kontakt betaling.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lovdata.no/all/tl-19850524-028-003.html#14&quot;&gt;Paragrafen
+i sentralbankloven&lt;/a&gt; lyder:&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;blockquote&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;§ 14. Tvungent betalingsmiddel&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Bankens sedler og mynter er tvungent betalingsmiddel i Norge. Ingen
+er pliktig til i én betaling å ta imot mer enn femogtyve mynter av
+hver enhet.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Sterkt skadde sedler og mynter er ikke tvungent
+betalingsmiddel. Banken gir nærmere forskrifter om erstatning for
+bortkomne, brente eller skadde sedler og mynter.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Selv om en avtale inneholder klausul om betaling av en
+pengeforpliktelse i gullverdi, kan skyldneren frigjøre seg med tvungne
+betalingsmidler uten hensyn til denne klausul.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/blockquote&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Det er med bakgrunn i denne lovet ikke tillatt å nekte å ta imot
+kontakt betaling.  Det er en lov jeg har sans for, og som jeg mener må
+håndheves strengt.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       
+       <item>
+               <title>Officeshots taking shape</title>
+               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Officeshots_taking_shape.html</link>
+               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Officeshots_taking_shape.html</guid>
+                <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:40:00 +0200</pubDate>
+               <description>
+&lt;p&gt;For those of us caring about document exchange and
+interoperability, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.officeshots.org/&quot;&gt;OfficeShots&lt;/a&gt;
+is a great service.  It is to ODF documents what
+&lt;a href=&quot;http://browsershots.org/&quot;&gt;BrowserShots&lt;/a&gt; is for web
+pages.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;A while back, I was contacted by Knut Yrvin at the part of Nokia
+that used to be Trolltech, who wanted to help the OfficeShots project
+and wondered if the University of Oslo where I work would be
+interested in supporting the project.  I helped him to navigate his
+request to the right people at work, and his request was answered with
+a spot in the machine room with power and network connected, and Knut
+arranged funding for a machine to fill the spot.  The machine is
+administrated by the OfficeShots people, so I do not have daily
+contact with its progress, and thus from time to time check back to
+see how the project is doing.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Today I had a look, and was happy to see that the Dell box in our
+machine room now is the host for several virtual machines running as
+OfficeShots factories, and the project is able to render ODF documents
+in 17 different document processing implementation on Linux and
+Windows.  This is great.&lt;/p&gt;
+</description>
+       </item>
+       

        <item>
                <title>Lenny-&gt;Squeeze upgrades, removals by apt and aptitude</title>
                <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Lenny__Squeeze_upgrades__removals_by_apt_and_aptitude.html</link>
        <item>
                <title>Lenny-&gt;Squeeze upgrades, removals by apt and aptitude</title>
                <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Lenny__Squeeze_upgrades__removals_by_apt_and_aptitude.html</link>


@@ -548,85 +622,5 @@ effekt på området der?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
        </item>
        
 </description>
        </item>
        

-       <item>
-               <title>KDM fail at boot with NVidia cards - and no one try to fix it?</title>
-               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/KDM_fail_at_boot_with_NVidia_cards___and_no_one_try_to_fix_it_.html</link>
-               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/KDM_fail_at_boot_with_NVidia_cards___and_no_one_try_to_fix_it_.html</guid>
-                <pubDate>Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:05:00 +0200</pubDate>
-               <description>
-&lt;p&gt;It is strange to watch how a bug in Debian causing KDM to fail to
-start at boot when an NVidia video card is used is handled.  The
-problem seem to be that the nvidia X.org driver uses a long time to
-initialize, and this duration is longer than kdm is configured to
-wait.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;I came across two bugs related to this issue,
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.debian.org/583312&quot;&gt;#583312&lt;/a&gt; initially filed
-against initscripts and passed on to nvidia-glx when it became obvious
-that the nvidia drivers were involved, and
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.debian.org/524751&quot;&gt;#524751&lt;/a&gt; initially filed against
-kdm and passed on to src:nvidia-graphics-drivers for unknown reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;To me, it seem that no-one is interested in actually solving the
-problem nvidia video card owners experience and make sure the Debian
-distribution work out of the box for these users.  The nvidia driver
-maintainers expect kdm to be set up to wait longer, while kdm expect
-the nvidia driver maintainers to fix the driver to start faster, and
-while they wait for each other I guess the users end up switching to a
-distribution that work for them.  I have no idea what the solution is,
-but I am pretty sure that waiting for each other is not it.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;I wonder why we end up handling bugs this way.&lt;/p&gt;
-</description>
-       </item>
-       
-       <item>
-               <title>Parallellized boot seem to hold up well in Debian/testing</title>
-               <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Parallellized_boot_seem_to_hold_up_well_in_Debian_testing.html</link>
-               <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Parallellized_boot_seem_to_hold_up_well_in_Debian_testing.html</guid>
-                <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 23:55:00 +0200</pubDate>
-               <description>
-&lt;p&gt;A few days ago, parallel booting was enabled in Debian/testing.
-The feature seem to hold up pretty well, but three fairly serious
-issues are known and should be solved:
-
-&lt;p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
-
-&lt;li&gt;The wicd package seen to
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.debian.org/508289&quot;&gt;break NFS mounting&lt;/a&gt; and
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.debian.org/581586&quot;&gt;network setup&lt;/a&gt; when
-parallel booting is enabled.  No idea why, but the wicd maintainer
-seem to be on the case.&lt;/li&gt;
-
-&lt;li&gt;The nvidia X driver seem to
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.debian.org/583312&quot;&gt;have a race condition&lt;/a&gt;
-triggered more easily when parallel booting is in effect.  The
-maintainer is on the case.&lt;/li&gt;
-
-&lt;li&gt;The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot
-sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.debian.org/575080&quot;&gt;try to switch back&lt;/a&gt; to
-sysv-rc.  One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create
-/etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make
-sysv-rc more robust.  Will investigate some more and probably upload a
-workaround in sysv-rc to help those trying to move from file-rc to
-sysv-rc get a working shutdown.&lt;/li&gt;
-
-&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;All in all not many surprising issues, and all of them seem
-solvable before Squeeze is released.  In addition to these there are
-some packages with bugs in their dependencies and run level settings,
-which I expect will be fixed in a reasonable time span.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;If you report any problems with dependencies in init.d scripts to
-the BTS, please usertag the report to get it to show up at
-&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=initscripts-ng-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org&quot;&gt;the
-list of usertagged bugs related to this&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;Update: Correct bug number to file-rc issue.&lt;/p&gt;
-</description>
-       </item>
-       

         </channel>
 </rss>
         </channel>
 </rss>