]> pere.pagekite.me Git - homepage.git/blob - blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt
fa90dd010754c9c826f8bfc77f53141a70a824b2
[homepage.git] / blog / data / 2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt
1 Title: IETF activity to standardise video codec
2 Tags: english, frikanalen, multimedia, video
3 Date: 2012-09-15 19:40
4
5 <p>After the
6 <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_standardize_its_first_multimedia_codec__Opus.html">Opus
7 codec made</a> it into <a href="http://www.ietf.org/">IETF</a> as
8 <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6716">RFC 6716</a>, I had a look
9 to see if there is any activity in IETF to standardize a video codec
10 too, and I was happy to discover that there is some activity in this
11 area. A non-"working group" mailing list
12 <a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec">video-codec</a>
13 was
14 <a href="http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/New-Non-WG-Mailing-List-video-codec-Video-codec-BoF-discussion-list-td119548.html">created 2012-08-20</a>. It is intended to discuss the topic and if a
15 formal working group should be formed.</p>
16
17 <p>I look forward to see how this plays out. There is already
18 <a href="http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec/current/msg00003.html">an
19 email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
20 participate in that group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
21 that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
22 multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
23 joining that group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
24 involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter anyway.</p>